Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

One of the primary advantages of a repeated-measures design, compared to an inde

ID: 3372183 • Letter: O

Question

One of the primary advantages of a repeated-measures design, compared to an independent-measures design, is that it reduces the overall variability by removing variance caused by individual dfferences. The following data are from a research study comparing three treatment conditions Person Totals P- 27 P-24 P-21 P-12 P-9 P-15 N-18 G-108 x-800 12 M-4 T-24 SS 42 M-6 T-36 SS-28 M-8 T- 48 SS- 34 Assume that the data are from an independent-measures study using three separate samples, each with n- 6 participants. Ignore the column of P totals and use an independent-measures ANOVA with a-.05 to test the significance of the mean differences. (Use three decimal places where needed.) Source Between treatments Within treatments MS Numerator Degroes of Fredom6 eo o What is the value of For?(Use three decimal places) Conclusion: O Reject the null hypothesis. There are no significant ifferences among the three groups O Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There are no significant differences among the three groups O Reject the null hypothesis. There are significant differences among the three groups O Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There are significant differences among the three groups

Explanation / Answer

Result:

Analysis of Variance

Source

DF

SS

MS

F-Value

P-Value

Treatment

2

48.00

24.000

3.462

0.058

Error

15

104.00

6.933

Total

17

152.00

Critical value F( 2,15) = 3.682

Calculated F=3.462 < critical F =3.682. Ho is not rejected.

Fail to reject the null hypothesis. There are no significant difference among the three groups.

Analysis of Variance

Source

DF

SS

MS

F-Value

P-Value

person

5

84.00

16.800

8.40

0.002

Treatment

2

48.00

24.000

12.00

0.002

Error

10

20.00

2.000

Total

17

152.00

F calculated = 12.000

F critical F( 2,10) =4.103

Calculated F=12.000 > critical F =4.103. Ho is rejected.

Reject the null hypothesis. There are significant difference among the three groups.

The repeated measure ANOVA reduces the error variances by removing individual differences. This increases the likelihood that make significant differences.

Source

DF

SS

MS

F-Value

P-Value

Treatment

2

48.00

24.000

3.462

0.058

Error

15

104.00

6.933

Total

17

152.00