Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Chapter 8, Section 2, Exercise 048 Light at Night Makes Fat Mice, Continued A st

ID: 3376571 • Letter: C

Question

Chapter 8, Section 2, Exercise 048 Light at Night Makes Fat Mice, Continued A study has shown that even low-level light at night can interfere with normal eating and sleeping cycles for mice. In the study, mice were randomly assigned to live in one of three light conditions: LD had a standard light/dark cycle, LL had bright light all the time, and DM had dim light when there normally would have been darkness. We have found that the groups had significantly different weight gain and time of calorie consumption. We can now explore these topics further. When Calories Are Consumed Researchers hypothesized that the increased weight gain seen in mice with light at night might be caused by when the mice are eating. Computer output for the percentage of food consumed during the day (when mice would normally be sleeping) for each of the three light conditions is shown, along with the relevant ANOVA output. Which light conditions give significantly different mean percentage of calories consumed during the day? Level Mean StDev 10 55.516 10.881 9 36.485 7.978 9 76.573 9.646 DM LD

Explanation / Answer

Solution

Back-up Theory

To test the equality of two population means, say

Null: H0: µ1 = µ2 Vs Alternative: HA: µ1 ? µ2

Test Statistic is:

t = (Xbar - Ybar)/[s?{(1/n1) + (1/n2)}] where

s2 = {(n1 – 1)s12 + (n2 – 1)s22}/(n1 + n2 – 2);

Xbar and Ybar are sample averages and s1, s2 are sample standard deviations based on n1 observations on X and n2 observations on Y respectively.

Decision Criterion (Rejection Region):

Reject H0 if | tcal | > tcrit or p-value < ?

Now to work out the solutions,

Preparatory Work

Case

DM vs LD

DM vs LL

LD vs LL

n1 =

10

10

9

n2 =

9

9

9

Xbar =

55.56

55.56

36.485

Ybar =

36.485

76.573

76.573

s1 =

10.881

10.881

7.978

s2 =

7.978

9.646

9.646

s^2 =

92.63255

106.4664

78.3469

s =

9.62458

10.31825

8.851378

tcal =

10.10337

9.42414

6.831984

p-value =

1.33E-08

3.67E-08

4.03E-06

Part (a) DM vs LD

| t | = 10.10

p-value = 1.33E -08

Decision: Reject H0

Conclusion: There is evidence of a difference in means between the two light conditions.

DONE

Part (b) DM vs LL

| t | = 9.42

p-value = 3.67E -08

Decision: Reject H0

Conclusion: There is evidence of a difference in means between the two light conditions.

DONE

Part (c) LD vs LL

| t | = 6.83

p-value = 4.03E -06

Decision: Reject H0

Conclusion: There is evidence of a difference in means between the two light conditions.

DONE

Case

DM vs LD

DM vs LL

LD vs LL

n1 =

10

10

9

n2 =

9

9

9

Xbar =

55.56

55.56

36.485

Ybar =

36.485

76.573

76.573

s1 =

10.881

10.881

7.978

s2 =

7.978

9.646

9.646

s^2 =

92.63255

106.4664

78.3469

s =

9.62458

10.31825

8.851378

tcal =

10.10337

9.42414

6.831984

p-value =

1.33E-08

3.67E-08

4.03E-06

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote