Five years old Cheyenne stark was riding in the back seat of her parents ford ta

Question

Five years old Cheyenne stark was riding in the back seat of her parents ford tarus . Cheyenne was no sitting in booster seat . Instead, she was using a seat belt design by Ford , but was wearing the shoulder belt behind her back.The car was involved in collision. An a result, Cheyenne suffered a spinal cord injury and was paralyzed from the waist down.th family filed a suit against Ford motor co , alleging that the seatbelt was defectively designed. Could ford successfully claim that Cheyenne had misused the seatbelt? Why ? Why not? I need elaborate. Five years old Cheyenne stark was riding in the back seat of her parents ford tarus . Cheyenne was no sitting in booster seat . Instead, she was using a seat belt design by Ford , but was wearing the shoulder belt behind her back.The car was involved in collision. An a result, Cheyenne suffered a spinal cord injury and was paralyzed from the waist down.th family filed a suit against Ford motor co , alleging that the seatbelt was defectively designed. Could ford successfully claim that Cheyenne had misused the seatbelt? Why ? Why not? I need elaborate.

Explanation / Answer

Yes, Ford can claim that the seat-belt was misused. This is because Cheyenne Stark was not of the appropriate height to use the seat-belt. Moreover, she was not sitting in the booster seat which would have helped alleviate some of the mechanical shocks in the accident.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse F
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.