Identify the study design: A total of 453 patients were individually randomised
ID: 3435377 • Letter: I
Question
Identify the study design: A total of 453 patients were individually randomised to one of: (1) standardised usual care with 3-monthly HbA1c (control, n = 152); (2) blood glucose self-testing with patient training focused on clinician interpretation of results in addition to usual care (less intensive self-monitoring, n = 150); (3) SMBG with additional training of patients in interpretation and application of the results to enhance motivation and maintain adherence to a healthy lifestyle (more intensive self-monitoring, n = 151).
The primary outcome was HBA1c at 12 months, and an intention-to-treat analysis, including all patients, was undertaken. Blood pressure, lipids, episodes of hypoglycaemia and quality of life, measured with the EuroQol 5 dimensions (EQ-5D), were secondary measures. An economic analysis was also carried out, and questionnaires were used to measure well-being, beliefs about use of SMBG and self-reports of medication taking, dietary and physical activities, and health-care resource use.
Retrospective Cohort Study
Prospective Cohort Study
Cross Sectional Study
Case Control Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
None of the Above
Retrospective Cohort Study
Prospective Cohort Study
Cross Sectional Study
Case Control Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
None of the Above
Explanation / Answer
In the study a randomized controlled trail is need to establish the anwers. Therefore, the study design is randomized controlled trail
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.