Question 2 (1 point) Burgess and Hitch (2005) say that \"Immediate serial recall

Question

Question 2 (1 point) Burgess and Hitch (2005) say that "Immediate serial recall (ISR) of a list of words is sensitive to their phonological similarity, but not their semantic similarity, whereas the reverse is true for memory after a delay of more than a few seconds. In other words, Someone is given a list of words that have to do with cleaning. In an immediate serial recall task, the person will likely think other words, that also have to do with cleaning were on the list even if they weren't. Someone is given a list of words, then asked to recall the ist after a short delay. The person will Iikely think other words that have similar meanings were on the list. Someone is given a list of words that have similar meanings but sound different from one another. When asked to recall the list immediately, the person might think other words that have similar meanings were on the list. o Someone is given a list of words. After a delay, the person might think words that sound similar were on the ist even if they weren't Save Question 3 (1 point) a collection of elements having strong associations with each other, but weak associations with other elements (Gobet et al.) O a generalization O a chunk

Explanation / Answer

2. The answer is Option 2. Bugress and Hitch (2002) findings can be applied to conclude that after a delay, an individual is likely to recall words that have similar meanings (semantic similarity) to the memorized list of words.

3. The answer is Option 2. A chunk is a collection of elements having a strong association with each other but weak association with other elements.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse Q
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.