Based on the Amanda Todd case, do an essay of 500 words that asks about how this
ID: 3447733 • Letter: B
Question
Based on the Amanda Todd case, do an essay of 500 words that asks about how this case may or not be considered as legally prosecutable under “conspiracy to commit harm, or defame.” Describe the methods you would use to decide such a charge.
Please reorganize this essay, just change the placement and exchange words:
It is hard to watch a young girl like Amanda Todd with so much potential and a bright future ahead to die at such a young age and feel as though she had no way to escape the torture and torment of cyber stalking. Amanda Todd deserves justice after not being able to live a stress free life where she can just be herself and focus on the things she loved to do like signing and meeting new people. Nobody is perfect, but there are so many children in the world who can make one bad decision just like Amanda Todd and end up paying for it badly. The point of a mistake is supposed to be to learn from them and move on with your life. Todd’s case may be considered as legally prosecutable under “conspiracy to commit hard, or defame.” Think of this case with the approach of was he determined to get something from her? Did he try to harm her? What was the result of his wrong stalking and blackmail? First, Let’s start with breaking down the charge.
Conspiracy crimes are the hardest crimes to argue because the definition of conspiracy is a secret plan made by two or more people to do something that is harmful or illegal. The act of secretly planning to do something that is harmful or illegal (Merriam-Webster, n.d.). Conspiracy literally means a group of people coming together to commit a crime. This means the crime was premeditated. Deformation is a tort regulated through state law that involves harm to someone’s reputation. (Packard, A, 2013). The definition of deformation is self-explanatory. It’s a state law saying you said or did something to someone ensure people see them differently than who they really are as a person. It is not easy to prove these things in most cases, but when looking at the Todd case, it is very easily seen.
It can be concluded that in the case of fifteen-year-old Amanda Todd, the intent to do something harmful or illegal is there and that her entire reputation was ruined. Her stalker was not a teenage boy or someone she knew and he knew distributing pictures of a minor on the internet was illegal as well as blackmail. He tried and successfully humiliated her time and time again even after she switched schools and tried to escape being bullied. He purposely made Facebook profiles and made her the profile picture and sent pictures to her teachers and whatever students could be found at her school online.
The Amanda Todd case should fall under “conspiracy to commit harm, or defame” Todd was stalked and ashamed by being a thoughtless adolescent. Minors are definitely targeted because they can be easily threatened by people who spend all their time hunting for their slip-ups so they can use them for personal achievement. Amanda unfortunately became a victim of this type of targeting and scrutiny and it ruined her life as she knew it and she took her life because of the mean nasty things done to her that she could not escape.
References:Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Retrieved October 15, 2016, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conspiracyPackard, A. (2013). Digital media law. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Explanation / Answer
Conspiracy crimes are the hardest crimes to argue because the definition of conspiracy is a secret plan made by two or more people to do something that is harmful or illegal. The act of secretly planning to do something that is harmful or illegal (Merriam-Webster, n.d.). Conspiracy literally means a group of people coming together to commit a crime. This means the crime was premeditated. Deformation is a tort regulated by the state law that involves harm to someone’s reputation. (Packard, A, 2013). The definition of deformation is self-explanatory. It’s a state law saying you said or did something to someone ensure people see them differently than who they really are as a person. It is not easy to prove these things in most cases, but when looking at the Todd case, it is very easily seen.It is hard to watch a young girl like Amanda Todd with so much potential and a bright future ahead to die at such a young age and feel as though she had no way to escape the torture and torment of cyberstalking. Amanda Todd deserves justice after not being able to live a stress-free where she can just be herself and focus on the things she loved to do like signing and meeting new people. Nobody is perfect, but there are so many children in the world who can make one bad decision just like Amanda Todd and end up paying for it badly. The point of a mistake is supposed to be to learn from them and move on with your life. Todd’s case may be considered as legally prosecutable under “conspiracy to commit hard, or defame.” Think of this case with the approach of was he determined to get something from her? Did he try to harm her? What was the result of his wrong stalking and blackmail? First, Let’s start with breaking down the charge.
The Amanda Todd case should fall under “conspiracy to commit harm, or defame” Todd was stalked and ashamed by being a thoughtless adolescent. Minors are definitely targeted because they can be easily threatened by people who spend all their time hunting for their slip-ups so they can use them for personal achievement. Amanda, unfortunately, became a victim of this type of targeting and scrutiny and it ruined her life as she knew it and she took her life because of the mean nasty things are done to her that she could not escape.
It can be concluded that in the case of fifteen-year-old Amanda Todd, the intent to do something harmful or illegal is there and that her entire reputation was ruined. Her stalker was not a teenage boy or someone she knew and he knew distributing pictures of a minor on the internet was illegal as well as blackmail. He tried and successfully humiliated her time and time again even after she switched schools and tried to escape being bullied. He purposely made Facebook profiles and made her the profile picture and sent pictures to her teachers and whatever students could be found at her school online.
References:Merriam-Webster. (n.d.). Retrieved October 15, 2016, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conspiracyPackard, A. (2013). Digital media law. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.