126 PART2 Writing an Argument the opponent\'s best case. In contrast, the fair s
ID: 3453044 • Letter: 1
Question
126 PART2 Writing an Argument the opponent's best case. In contrast, the fair summary follows the "principle of char- ity," allowing the strength of the opposing view to come through clearly FOR WRITING AND DISCUSSION Distinguishing Fair from MyWritingLab Unfair Summaries two summaries of Lisa Turner's article. 1. What makes the first summary unfair? How can you tell? 2. In the unfair summary, what strategies does the writer use to make the opposing view seem weak and flawed? In the fair summary, how is the opposing view made strong and clear? 3. In the unfair summary, how does the writer attack Turner's motives and credentials? k is sometimes called an ad hominem argument ("against the person"-see Appendix 1 for a definition of this reasoning fallacy) in that it attacks the arguer rather than the argument. How does the writer treat Turner differently in the fair summary? 4. Do you agree with our view that arguments are more persuasive if the writer summarizes opposing views fairly rather than unfairly? Why? instructor gives you, using the strategies you analyzed in the Turner examples. Refuting Opposing Views Group task: As a group, write a fair and an unfair summary of an argument that your Once you have summarized opposing views, you can either refute them or concedExplanation / Answer
1. In the unfair summary the arguments are opinions not facts. The argument are distorted to create ambiguity and are made weak by oversimplification.
2. In the unfair summary, the writer uses Straw man fallacy to make the opposing view seem weak and flawed. The writer distorted and exagerrated the opposing view, making it weak and flawed.
In the fair summary the opposing views are discussed in a deductive manner, so that clarity is maintained, allowing the strength of the opposing views to come out clearly.
3. In the unfair summary the writer present a bad image of Turner by distorting his views and ideas , he exaggerates and oversimplifies Turner's argument. This makes Turner's motives and credentials to be doubtful and dubious.
In fair summary Turner's argument and viewpoints are discussed to bring out the strength of his argument, giving it clarity.
4. Yes, arguments are more persuasive if the writer summarizes opposing views fairly than unfairly because unfair summary make the opposing view weak by attacking the credibility of the person rather than the argument itself. Whereas, fair summary discuss the the opposing views to bring out it's strenghts with clarity.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.