MORY-WordPad nt\'s format. Some content might be missing or displayed improperly

Question

MORY-WordPad nt's format. Some content might be missing or displayed improperly MEMORY Suppose that you have been called as an expert witness (for the defense) for a defendant accused of robbing a bank. Before you witnesses and comfidently identified the defendant as the robber. It is now your turn on the witness stand take the witness stand, two bank tellers were called as What research evidence might you introduce to the jury to caution them about assuming that the defendant must be guilty because he or she was identified in court? (Your response should be approximately 75-100 words in length).

Explanation / Answer

Being an eye witness of the defendent , I will disclose the fact that my eye was revealed on that time the robbery was taken place. It will also includes the actions that the defendent had taken and what after which steps . Further , the dresses that the defendent wore that time was also to be disclosed. At last the supporting statements if any in view of the tellers may be disclosed to the court that proves the defendent is guilt of doing this crime.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse M
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.