Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Voir dire allows attorneys: A. to question the veracity of a witness\'s testimon

ID: 3455226 • Letter: V

Question

Voir dire allows attorneys:

A.

to question the veracity of a witness's testimony in criminal cases.

B.

and judges to examine potential jurors to determine their acceptability to serve on a jury.

C.

to subpoena important witnesses who may not otherwise be willing to appear in court.

D.

and judges to question witnesses on the stand in civil cases.

If a potential juror is asked to be removed without explanations as to why he or she is unlikely to be able to deliver an impartial verdict, this type of removal is referred to as:

A.

a challenge for cause.

B.

a peremptory challenge.

C.

a predisposition challenge.

D.

a challenge for bias.

A.

to question the veracity of a witness's testimony in criminal cases.

B.

and judges to examine potential jurors to determine their acceptability to serve on a jury.

C.

to subpoena important witnesses who may not otherwise be willing to appear in court.

D.

and judges to question witnesses on the stand in civil cases.

Explanation / Answer

Ans 1 : B) and judges to examine potential jurors to determine their acceptability to serve on a jury

Voir dire can be said to be a basic examination that examines different jurors , witnesses etc to investigate the truth during the trial and determine their accetability to serve to a judge.

It is hence the final stage in which the jury is selected.

Ans 2 : A) A challenge for cause

The juror is removed without any explanation of his actions or behavior in the trial , this calls for the challenge for cause. A proper explanation demanded from the juror or given for his removal could have sufficed for his ethical eviction.