John B. Watson (1878-1958), on pages 18-19, contended that individuals were born

Question

John B. Watson (1878-1958), on pages 18-19, contended that individuals were born with a blank slate. Watson stated, “Give me a dozen healthy infants, well-formed, and my own specified world to bring them up in and I’ll guarantee to take any one at random and train him to become any type of specialist I might select—a doctor, lawyer, artist, merchant-chief, and yes, even into beggarman and thief, regardless of his talents penchants, tendencies, abilities, vocations, and race of his ancestors. (Watson, 1925, p.10). 1.Given what you have read, is this an accurate depiction of human capabilities? 2. Do you believe this argument could lead to the practice of discrimination?

Explanation / Answer

1. In my view, Watson’s statement is far from an accurate description of human capabilities. There is sufficient empirical evidence that supports the nature-nurture view of human development, emphasising both hereditary and environment factors. Watson, on the other hand, focused solely on environmental variables while completely ignoring the importance of genetics.

2. I believe that this argument should not lead to the practice of discrimination. Perceived fundamental differences between two individuals usually forms the basis of discrimination and according to Watson, there are no innate differences among humans. The variations found among individuals are the result of their environment offering no strong justification for discrimination.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse J
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.