make a detailed responce to the follwing : The atomic bomb test changed the cult
ID: 3462022 • Letter: M
Question
make a detailed responce to the follwing :
The atomic bomb test changed the culture of the Utrik people both physically and emotionally. The bomb that destroyed Bikini Island caused the environment of Utrik Island to be damaged and its people to be poisoned. Many inhabitants suffered diseases from the exposer to such high concentration of radiation. If this weren't drastic enough, the spirit of the Utrik people was diminished. Macionis wrote, "But even today, those who survived consider themselves and their island poisoned by the radiation, and they believe that the poison will never go away...it was a social transformation that left the people with a deep belief that they are all sick, that life will never be the same, and that powerful people who live on the other side of the world could have prevented the disaster but did not." (676). The effects of the bomb altered the comfort and security of the Utrik people.
The U.S government should take responsibility for what happened. Our military detonated the bomb in the expectation that its damage would travel northward. However, the debris took to the east and hurt the lives of an entire island. The government is responsible for producing and detonating the bomb, therefore it is responsible to right the damage it created.
Explanation / Answer
Note: This response is in UK English, please paste the response to MS Word and you should be able to spot discrepancies easily. You may elaborate the answer based on personal views or your classwork if necessary.
(Answer) Throughout history, it has mostly been the nations that have been superpowers that generally invade, capture, attack, pillage and plunder other nations. Also, the nations under attack have generally been ones that have either not had the means to attack back or the ones that have been caught up in a political scuffle. In most cases, these problems could have easily been solved through diplomatic and peaceful negotiations.
The mature way that a nation should adopt in order to handle a situation is to simply have a political discussion about how issues could be overcome without innocent people getting hurt. However, if there is ever a situation where nations do go to war or manage to cause some kind of loss to another state that is mostly unwarranted, it is the duty of the attacking nation to make reparations.
The central idea of this situation is that the choice of one individual clearly has consequences that several people might have to bear. This is when the decisions that a leader might make would boil down to selfishness and a sense of ethical responsibility. Even if these good attributes are not part of a leader’s repertoire, the question that the public should ask is if the leader is willing to spend large amounts of money in reparation in order to bear the consequences.
Leaders tend to make choices in an assumption that they are the only ones affected by a decision. The truth is generally that there are soldiers with families, civilians with neighbours and children who have nothing to do with the political tensions who are the victim of such situations. Simply because these individuals do not have the chance to speak at offices in high places, that does not mean that they are not entitled to their own rights.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.