1. It is often said that \"there is no accounting for taste.\" Sociologists argu
ID: 3468634 • Letter: 1
Question
1. It is often said that "there is no accounting for taste." Sociologists argue that we can in fact account for taste. This is reflected in Bryson’s and Alderson, Junisbai, and Heacock’s findings that:
2. We talked in the mini lecture about how Americans evaluate librarians and truck drivers in terms of their social standing. In light of Weber’s definition of “status groups” and our discussion of the fundamentals of social status, which of the following is probably least important for how Americans think about this?
3. Analysis of romantic relationships in U.S. high schools reveals the "no 4-cycle" rule. This is the rule that:
4. Which of the following best characterizes the omnivore-univore argument about the cultural consumption of high status people?
5. When Alderson, Junisbai, and Heacock examine how people consume culture (e.g., whether they go to the opera, visit museums, go to pop concerts, go to the movies, etc.), which of the following groups do they observe?
tastes and cultural consumption vary systematically with factors like education and social statusExplanation / Answer
Ans. 1 Option A
The taste and cultural consumption vary systemically with factors like education and social status.
Ans. 2 Option B
The fact that income of a truck driver and librarians are same, this factor will not make attentive to Americans.
Ans. 3 Option A
The cycle rule 4 describes that we should not get involved with ex of ex’s current boyfriend and girlfriend.
Ans. 4 Option B
High status people consume high and elite culture and look down on popular culture as crude and disreputable.
Ans. 5 Option C
A group that consumes everything, both high culture and popular culture.
?
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.