https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGoPqDOxXRs Philosophy “Architects and Engineers

Question

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGoPqDOxXRs

Philosophy

“Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth” video :

1.) What is the main point that the video makes?

2.) What evidence do the producers present to prove that point?

3.) Is there any rhetoric in the form of emotional appeals present?   That is, are there parts of the video that attempt to manipulate emotions?

4.) Please use the ARG method from Pwr Pnt 4 to evaluate the argument presented in the video:

a.) Are the premises acceptable? List 2 and analyze.

b.) Is there relevance between the premises? Are there any irrelevancies present?

c.) Do the producers provide grounds for accepting their conclusion?

5.) In general, are the producers effective in proving their point? Is theirs a “good” argument? Explain

Explanation / Answer

First question only-

The main point of discussion is the WTC7 crashed due to bomb explosions rather than the Plane attack. They did not take the collision of the plane as the main cause also not suggesting shockwaves from the impact as the main cause of the building crash.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse H
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.