The rule nonconsequentialist theories essentially state that there are certain m

Question

The rule nonconsequentialist theories essentially state that there are certain moral absolutes that should never be violated (e.g., rules against killing, mutilating, stealing and breaking promises). To what extent do you agree or disagree with this idea? Are there certain do's and don'ts to which human beings should always adhere and what are they? Why should they adhere to these moral principles, and what are the reasons behind this view of yours? The response entered here will appear in the performance dashboard and can be viewed by your instructor.

Explanation / Answer

Rights and Justice

Conclusion:

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse T
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.