Fink and Kensicki (2002) posed possible explanations for the contrast in how wom
ID: 3494319 • Letter: F
Question
Fink and Kensicki (2002) posed possible explanations for the contrast in how women were portrayed in Sports Illustrated for Women vs. Sports Illustrated. Which of the following is NOT one of those explanations?
a. Homophobia
b. The need to satisfy advertisers and the general sports readership in order to make the magazine profitable
c. Women readers are more interested in hearing about athletes’ families and personal stories
d. Ambivalence in portraying positive images of female athletes combined with subtle messages that tend to trivialize female athletes’ sports performances
a. Homophobia
b. The need to satisfy advertisers and the general sports readership in order to make the magazine profitable
c. Women readers are more interested in hearing about athletes’ families and personal stories
d. Ambivalence in portraying positive images of female athletes combined with subtle messages that tend to trivialize female athletes’ sports performances
Explanation / Answer
a.Homophobia
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.