Hello, could you please answer my question, I’ll recommend your answer to Chegg,

Question

Hello, could you please answer my question, I’ll recommend your answer to Chegg, and I will also comment and will like your response, please answer correctly. Thank you so much

In Source 4 analyze the argument made by either author. What is the REAL argument? Is there anything strange or fishy about the source? For example, what "rings false" about Tudebode's story? This source, as we know, is questionable; but it suggests things about the "Saracens" that are odd.
drive.google.com Solut Hi. Could You Please ms and Christians larg. 4. From Peter Tudebode, History of the Jerusalem Journey On another day the Turks led to the top of an Antiochian wall a noble knight, Rainald Porchet, whom they had imprisoned in a foul dungeon. They then told him that he should inquire from the Christian pilgrims how much they would pay for his ransom before he lost his head. From the heights of the wall Rainald ad- dressed the leaders: "My lords, it matters not if I die, and I pray you, my brothers, that you pay no ransom for me. But be certain in the faith of Christ and the Holy Sepulchre that God is with you and shall be forever. You have slain all the lead- ers and the bravest men of Antioch; namely, twelve emirs and fifteen thousand noblemen, and no one remains to give battle with you or to defend the city." The Turks asked what Rainald had said. The interpreter replied: "Nothing good concerning you was said." The emir, Yaghi Siyan, immediately ordered him to descend from the wall and spoke to him through an interpreter: "Rainald, do you wish to enjoy life honorably with us?" Rainald replied: "How can I live honorably with you without sinning?" The emir answered: "Deny your God, whom you worship and believe, and accept Mohammed and our other gods. If you do so we shall give to you all that 8 199 you desire such as gold, horses, mules, and many other worldly goods which yo wish, as well as wives and inheritances; and we shall enrich you with great lands Rainald replied to the emir: "Give me time for consideration"; and the em and

Explanation / Answer

The Real Argument in this story is, the author is claiming about the atrocious nature of "Saracens". While providing reasons to believe that the "Saracens" (the Turksh Muslims) were real cruel and atrocious, the author have exaggerated the incidents. This is intentionally done to evoke emotions of sympathy for christians and their cause, and emotions of anger we against the 'Saracens' and their atrocities in the readers. Also, the facts have not been presented with actual reasonings. Hence, these points makes the story to sound false, that is to "ring false".

If the cruelty of the 'SARACENS' had been presented accurately without exaggeration and appeal to the emotions, the story would not had been fallicious at presenting its argument about the cruelty committed by the 'SARACENS' against Christians of Jerusalem.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse H
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.