ENGL 1020 English Composition II Essay #1 Possible Topics/Instructions Essay #1
ID: 3506534 • Letter: E
Question
ENGL 1020 English Composition II Essay #1 Possible Topics/Instructions Essay #1 should follow all MLA format rules. The essay should be 800 words, with at least 2 primary sources cited in the essay, and have a proper MLA formatted works cited page. Possible Topics: Note: You may also choose your own topic for Essay #1 Explain a Modern example of a social contract that must be revised. Be clear in your explanation of why the social contract should be altered or abolished. .Has Jefferson's "Declaration of Independence" become a version of a revised social contract? How and why has it been changed? Explain. Taking a modern leader, explain how their leadership style meshes with Lao-Tzu and/or Machiavelli. You may also take a leader from history or even fiction. .How relevant is Rousseau's social contract idea in our modern world? Give specific examples. Do you a gree with Emerson's idea that the individual is more important than the government? o Focus on morals, property, or ideas/theoriesExplanation / Answer
For thousands of years philosophers have contemplated many different kinds of government. There have been many different kinds of governments created but not many were effective. The philosophers Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu spoke differently on how a leader should control the people he rules. In their respective essays “The Qualities of the Prince” and “Thoughts from the Tao-Te Ching” they are both strongly set in their ideas. Despite their vast differences in philosophy, the ideas of Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu could be combined to create an effective government.Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu have some comparable ideas that could be combined to create an effective government. Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu have a comparable idea that a leader must notspend a lot of money on luxuries. A leader must spend money wisely and efficiently to avoid chaos. Throughout history many empires have fallen because leaders would spend ridiculous amounts of money for luxuries and for pleasure. While they do this the people of their country are starving to death. This then leads to uprising and revolts across the country. Machiavelli in “The Qualities of the Prince” discusses what happens when a prince continues to put on lavish displays. Machiavelli says that when a leader starts to spend money on unnecessary things the country starts to lose money, the leader will then have to “burden the people with excessive taxesand do everything possible to raise funds. This will begin to make him hateful to his subjects” (Machiavelli 225). In Lao-Tzu’s essay “Thoughts from the Tao-Te Ching” he talks about not being too extravagent. He takes more of a religious standpoint stating that it is not keeping with the Tao. Lao-Tzu talks about situations where the rich spend all of their money on luxuries and extravagance and the poor struggle and starve, all the while the government does nothing “all this is robbery and chaos. It is not keeping with the Tao.” (Lao-Tzu 211). They both talk about how being extravagant and spending lots of money is not good for the state or for the leader. When a government starts spending the people’s hard-earned money on luxuries it starts to deteriorate the state. Their ideas about not spending money are comparable. With this idea in place it will help any government flourish and prosper. A leader has to spend his country’s money wisely to avoid the downfall of his rule. Machiavelli’s and Lao-Tzu’s comparable idea that a leader must not spend a lot of money on luxuries would help create an effective government.Machiavelli and Lao-Tzu have a comparable idea that a leader must be realistic about the state of his country in order to have an effective government. When one is unrealistic about the state of their country they cannot properly rule. When a leader expects unreasonable tasks from his subjects, the task will not get done. If a leader expects peace in a country where there is only chaos then he will certainly be disappointed.
Lao-tzu,” the bad leader is he who the people despise. The good leader is he who the people praise. The great leader is he who the people say, “We did it ourselves.” We did it ourselves. No wonder the role of “leader as designer” is often neglected. A designer’s role is usually a quiet role. It happens behind the scenes, often undetected, without all the glory and fanfare attributed to traditional leadership. Yet, being foundational, it is vital to success.
The ruler is entitled to provide the people with space, enough space for each individual person. Lao-Tzu is concerned for individual's whole freedom, death included. Andwhen the ruler dies it is the communities’ job to make sure that where the person is buried is nice .
Thanks rate the question if satisfied.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.