Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

While the concept of minors having legal precedent to make important decisions a

ID: 3512877 • Letter: W

Question

While the concept of minors having legal precedent to make important decisions about health care has been established in state and federal policy, many ethical, moral and legal liability issues surround this topic. Using the critical thinking skills learned from this course and credible academic/professional (no wiki websites) sources write an essay explaining your position on the following questions. Be certain to back up your position with reason, logic and evidence.

What happens when parents and children have conflicting opinions about treatment?

Can a parent refuse lifesaving medical treatment for his/her child? Why or why not, explain your position.

How old does a child have to be to make their own medical decisions? Explain why you agree or disagree.

Can healthcare professionals override parental decision to withhold medical treatment? Should healthcare professionals be able to override parental decisions to withhold medical treatment?

Should parents be allowed to refuse medical treatment for their child?

Should minors be allowed consent to the follow services without parental notification: contraceptive services, testing and services for HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases, prenatal care and delivery services. Treatment for alcohol and drug abuse, mental health care.

Try to discuss each question including pros and cons, legality in California, moral and ethical concerns and your role in the health care industry in relation to these issues. 2000 word minimum. cite your references.

Explanation / Answer

Answer:-

To ensure that the best decisions are made for children and adolescents, these decisions should be made jointly by members of the health care team, the child or adolescent’s parents, and sometimes the child or adolescent. Children and adolescents should be involved in decision-making to an increasing degree as they develop, until they are capable of making their own decisions about treatment. End-of-life decision-making, whether or not the child or adolescent is involved, is especially complex.

This policy offers physicians some principles and strategies to facilitate the best possible decisions for their patients. It is not intended to apply to research or to the use of innovative (non-validated) therapy.