suit against the café for dilution of its traue you t \" Sambuck\'s Coffee House
ID: 351473 • Letter: S
Question
suit against the café for dilution of its traue you t " Sambuck's Coffee House of Astoria, Oregon, has trademarks? Do these cases been sued by Starbucks for dilution. However, THE LAW ECONOMICS, BUSINESS STRATEGY Who Owns "A Wonderful Life"? In 1946, director Frank Capra produced I's a Wonder. ful Life, a movie based on a short story by Philip Van Doren Stern called "The Greatest Gift." The movie, his story copyright in place, royalties for its use in the movie had to be paid once again. The owners of It's a Wonderful Life began charging fees to cover their fees to Mr. Stern, and the result was costly access. It's a Won- derful Life was seen on television day and night during the holiday season when the copyright on the movie starring limmy Stewart, did not perform well at the box office, and, although it received five Academy Award nominations, it won no awards. The movie's copyright was allowed to lapse. Television stations showed the classic without paying fees because the copyright had lapsed. had lapsed. Now, with the copyright clarification, the movie rights have been reprotected. The story's con- tinuing protection and the high royalty fees make It'sa decision in Steuwart Wonderful Life a singular holiday event. However, the US. Supreme Court decision in Stewart o Abend, 495 U.S. 207 (1990), offering an extension of What is the relationship between movie copyrights and the copyright protection of the underlying story to the rights to the underlying story? Who owns what should businesses negotiating movie rights and royal the movie, affected Jimmy Stewart's life once again.between story authors and movie producers? What The original story owner, Mr. Stern, held the rights to the story since the movie rights had lapsed. With s ad lpsed should businesses negotiating movie rights and roy ties be certain about before signing an agreement?Explanation / Answer
Movie copyrights are derivative results of the rights to the underlying story. The underlying rights to the story is owned by the author of the book.
In this case, the story’s rights belong to Philip Van Doren Stern. This is the underlying rights. Frank Capra bought the rights to make the movie and publish from Stern and the movie copyrights were sold to the TV channels and Theaters.
The underlying rights is the actual right to the content. The movie copyrights are derived from the underlying copyright of the story. In other words the movie copyrights are result of underlying copyrights.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.