The following just needs a reply please Since the specifications for the program

Question

The following just needs a reply please


Since the specifications for the program require it to have the potential to scale to a large user base utilizing the software on multiple platforms, hard coding the components, size and layout would be a poor choice.  Hard coding would reduce the modularity of the application and could show a different GUI to users on different operating systems and monitor screen sizes. Layout managers are more efficient from a performance perspective and allow for a seamless interface across operating systems.  The layout manager has a MVC (model/view/controller) architecture, which is a natrual fit for OOP programming techniques.  The layout manager dynamically sizes the layout at runtime, which offers a more flexible design structure if you are building for multiple operating systems.  Layout managers also have the added benefit of including fonts. The following just needs a reply please


Since the specifications for the program require it to have the potential to scale to a large user base utilizing the software on multiple platforms, hard coding the components, size and layout would be a poor choice.  Hard coding would reduce the modularity of the application and could show a different GUI to users on different operating systems and monitor screen sizes. Layout managers are more efficient from a performance perspective and allow for a seamless interface across operating systems.  The layout manager has a MVC (model/view/controller) architecture, which is a natrual fit for OOP programming techniques.  The layout manager dynamically sizes the layout at runtime, which offers a more flexible design structure if you are building for multiple operating systems.  Layout managers also have the added benefit of including fonts.

Explanation / Answer

Of course, just because you can add SaaS to your IT infrastructure is not by itself a reason to do it; there has to be a viable business reason, too. SaaS offers substantial opportunities for organizations of all sizes to shift the risks of software acquisition, and to move IT from a reactive cost center to being a proactive, value-producing part of the enterprise.

Traditionally, deploying large-scale business-critical software systems, such as ERP and CRM application suites, has been a major undertaking. Deploying these systems across a large enterprise can cost hundreds of thousands of dollars in upfront licensing cost, and usually requires an army of IT personnel and consultants to customize and integrate it with the organization's other systems and data. The time, staff, and budget requirements of a deployment of this magnitude represent a significant risk for an organization of any size, and often puts such software out of the reach of smaller organizations that would otherwise be able to derive from it a great deal of utility.

The on-demand delivery model changes some of this. SaaS applications don't require the deployment of a large infrastructure at the client's location, which eliminates or drastically reduces the upfront commitment of resources. With no significant initial investment to amortize, an enterprise that deploys a SaaS application that turns out to produce disappointing results can walk away and pursue a different direction, without having to abandon an expensive on-premise infrastructure.

Additionally, if custom integration is not required, SaaS applications can be planned and executed with minimal effort and roll-out activities, creating one of the shortest time-to-value intervals possible for a major IT investment. This has also made it possible for a number of SaaS vendors to offer risk-free (and often literally free) "test drives" of their software for a limited period, such as 30 days. Giving prospective customers a chance to try the software before they buy it helps eliminate much of the risk surrounding software purchase.

For more information about the business benefits of SaaS.

With SaaS, the job of deploying an application and keeping it running from day to day%u2014testing and installing patches, managing upgrades, monitoring performance, ensuring high availability, and so forth%u2014is handled by the provider. By transferring the responsibility for these "overhead" activities to a third party, the IT department can focus more on high-value activities that align with and support the business goals of the enterprise. Instead of being primarily reactive and operations-focused, the chief information officer (CIO) and IT staff can more effectively function as technology strategists to the rest of the company, working with business units to understand their business needs and advise them on how best to use technology to accomplish their objectives. Far from being made obsolete by SaaS, the IT department has an opportunity to contribute to the success of the enterprise more directly than ever before.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse T
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.