\"How will this continue to affect our country’s rank in science and technologic
ID: 3576499 • Letter: #
Question
"How will this continue to affect our country’s rank in science and technological development in the future, should this model of governance continue?"
*This was the last question in a series of questions for a discussion. The first three parts of questions were in regards to the governance of technology:
1) Very few elected officials in America have professional training in science or technology. Does this inhibit the effective governance of science and technology?
2) Do you think that the American government would be substantially different if most senators and congresspersons previously worked and scientists or engineers instead of lawyers, as is the case today? Should it be a requirement to serve on science and technology committees?
3) Find an example of a piece of legislation or political movement that was wrongly founded on the misunderstanding of basic science and technology. Give a brief background. Should this movement/bill been supported or unsupported?
Explanation / Answer
Answer
Very few voted officials in America have specialized training in science or skill. This does not mean that the supremacy will be weak reason being that they are being assisted by a team of folks who excel in skill and have the mandatory expertise. So, this does not inhibit the effective governance of science and skill. The American government would be substantially different if most politicians and congress peoples previously worked as experts or engineers instead of as lawyers, as is the circumstance today as it would have a better method towards talent but then may be social issues would be ignored.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.