Compare the designs produced by conflict resolution using Jackson’s Technique an

Question

Compare the designs produced by conflict resolution using Jackson’s Technique and traditional solutions incorporating the entire problem into a single program with respect to machine efficiency. Explain why the loss of machine efficiency is or is not significant in light of today’s computing environment considering both hardware and personnel expenses. and also explain in detail how any reduction in machine efficiency due to conflict resolution using Jackson’s Technique may be minimized using ”program inversion” in detail with an appropriate example. What are the advantages of solving conflicts with Jackson’s method from the standpoint of software engineering metrics, use in multiple projects, and utilizing multiple programmers on a project?please be specifice

Explanation / Answer

The necessity for quality and safety improvement initiatives permeates health care.1, 2 Quality health care is defined as “the degree to which health services for individuals and populations increase the likelihood of desired health outcomes and are consistent with current professional knowledge”3 (p. 1161). According to the Institute of Medicine (IOM) report, To Err Is Human,4 the majority of medical errors result from faulty systems and processes, not individuals. Processes that are inefficient and variable, changing case mix of patients, health insurance, differences in provider education and experience, and numerous other factors contribute to the complexity of health care. With this in mind, the IOM also asserted that today’s health care industry functions at a lower level than it can and should, and it put forth the following six aims of health care: effective, safe, patient-centered, timely, efficient, and equitable.2 The aims of effectiveness and safety are targeted through process-of-care measures, assessing whether providers of health care perform processes that have been demonstrated to achieve the desired aims and avoid those processes that are predisposed toward harm. The goals of measuring health care quality are to determine the effects of health care on desired outcomes and to assess the degree to which health care adheres to processes based on scientific evidence or agreed to by professional consensus and is consistent with patient preferences.

Because errors are caused by system or process failures,5 it is important to adopt various process-improvement techniques to identify inefficiencies, ineffective care, and preventable errors to then influence changes associated with systems. Each of these techniques involves assessing performance and using findings to inform change. This chapter will discuss strategies and tools for quality improvement—including failure modes and effects analysis, Plan-Do-Study-Act, Six Sigma, Lean, and root-cause analysis—that have been used to improve the quality and safety of health care.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse C
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.