THE FOLLOWING QUESTION SHOULD NOT TAKE MORE THAN A PARAGRAPH OR TWO TO ANSWER! A
ID: 360399 • Letter: T
Question
THE FOLLOWING QUESTION SHOULD NOT TAKE MORE THAN A PARAGRAPH OR TWO TO ANSWER! After a long meeting with some executives of the company, Jane enters an elevator in the building owned by Hi Flyer, Inc., and presses the button for the floor she wants to reach. The doors to the elevator close and suddenly the elevator goes into free fall, stopping abruptly at the lobby. Jane is seriously hurt and sues Hi-Flyer for damages. Upon receipt of the complaint, Hi-Flyer moves for summary judgment, noting that, while it is clear that Jane did fall, she has never proven, or for that matter even offered a theory as to why the elevator functioned incorrectly. Therefore, argues Hi-Flyer, there is no evidence that they were at fault. What is the ruling of the Court?Explanation / Answer
The ruling of the court would be that the since Jane was availing the services of the elevator og the building owned by Hi. Flyer and has been hurt while availing the service of the elevator.Therefore it is the responsibilty of the building ownere and hence jane should be compensated for the injury suffered due to the free fall of elevator.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.