Anyone who can help me with this? 1 5. Consider the iterative improvement algori
ID: 3605592 • Letter: A
Question
Anyone who can help me with this?
Explanation / Answer
Iterative improvement
Suppose t – digit where is base arithmetic , then we will calculated result ˆ x assures
(A + A)ˆx = b
||A|| equaling u||A|| , u = 1/2 ()^1t . The solution ˆx is the vector b Axˆ.
As per Gaussian elimination creates a solution ˆx with comparatively small residual
||b Axˆ|| equaling u||A||||xˆ||.
Small residuals don’t entail high exactness.
we can use the formula that computed true theorem
(||xˆ x|| ) / (||x||) uK(A).
If the one round off and condition satisfy at u is nearer to 10d and K(A) nears equals to 10^q
So Gaussian elimination gives a result for ˆx that is d q accurate decimal digits.
Suppose Ax = b has been solved via the partial pivoting factorization
On the off chance that the machine accuracy u and condition number fulfill u 10d and K(A) 10q at that point .after k executions of the algorithm, x has around min(d, k(d q)) revise digits.
On the off chance that uK(A) 1, at that point iterative change can deliver an answer x that has t redress digits. Note that the procedure is moderately shabby in flops. Each improvement costs O(n^2 ) flops
while the original disintegration costs O(n^3 ) flops.
The main drawbacks is memory requirements are two times for the reason that an original copy of A be supposed to be stored in memory. And it is memory dependent.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.