Case 7.4 Massey Coal Mines, Fatalities, And Indictments; and Case 7.4 Massey Coa

Question

Case 7.4 Massey Coal Mines, Fatalities, And Indictments; and

Case 7.4 Massey Coal Mines, Fatalities, and Indictments In 2010, an explosion at the Upper Big Branch mine in West Virginia resulted in the loss of the lives of twenty-nine miners at the site. The mine was owned and operated by a subsidiary of Massey Energy. The Mine Safety and Health Administration conducted an investigation, and its report on the accident concluded that Massey had a “dubious” record of safety documentation that involved the use of multiple sets of records that resulted in problems at the mine being concealed from federal inspectors. As a result of the investigation, a series of criminal charges were brought against man- agers and other employees at the mine. One employee, who was transferred from the Upper Big Branch mine before the 2010 explosion, was convicted of lying to safety offi- cials and sentenced to ten months in prison. David Hughart, the president of the mine- operating unit, entered a guilty plea to conspiracy to defraud the U.S. government by impeding mine safety inspectors and conspiracy to violate safety laws. When asked by the federal judge who ordered him to give miners advance notice of inspections, he responded that his orders came from the CEO.3 The charges indicate that Mr. Hughart and others ordered workers to violate airflow and coal-dust standards. Hughie Elbert Stover was the security chief for the Upper Big Branch mine and was indicted on federal charges including lying to investigators, destroying mine records, and alerting employees when federal mine inspectors were coming to the mine. The charges that Mr. Stover faced involved training security guards on how to use their radio systems to alert employees that federal mine inspectors were on the premises. Mr. Stover took the stand at his trial, and his testimony included the following state- ments about his disposal of the records, which he admits doing but claims that he did not understand that what he was doing was criminal: It never crossed my mind that I was doing something illegal ... There’s nothing on earth that would make me commit a crime. I wouldn’t wish on anyone the heartache and misery I’ve put them [his family] through.”4 Mr. Stover said on the stand that he was simply destroying documents because the mine’s warehouse was full, and it was routine to destroy documents as they made room for new records. Mr. Stover’s lawyer argued in his opening statement that the records were destroyed mistakenly and that federal officials were able to obtain the lost informa- tion from other company sources. As to the advance notification of the presence of mine inspectors, Mr. Stover, accord- ing to the Wall Street Journal, testified that he was told by an Upper Big Branch mine superintendent that security guards could announce over the mine radio that safety inspectors were on the site. He said he believed that was an acceptable practice, approved by company lawyers, and different from calling mine managers individually on the phone. He said that he did not lie to investigators when they asked him if he notified miners of an impending inspection because he did not notify anyone individually.5 Mr. Stover was found guilty of obstruction, lying to investigators, and giving advance notice of inspections, and was sentenced to three years in prison.6 The superintendent that Mr. Stover referred to in his testimony was Gary May. Mr. May entered a guilty plea to conspiracy to defraud the United States. The U.S. attorney handling the case made a statement at the time of the plea indicating that “laws were routinely violated” because of the company’s and individual managers’ beliefs that “following those laws would decrease coal production.”7 Don Blankenship, the CEO of Massey Energy at the time of the mine explosion, resigned as CEO in December 2010. Massey was sold to Alpha Natural Resources, Inc., in June 2011.

Discussion Questions

1. Describe the ethical categories involved in the explosion and conduct of the managers of the mine.

2. Why does Mr. Stover say he did not have any intent to violate the law that prohibits advance notification of the presence of inspectors?

3. Should the CEO be held accountable?

Explanation / Answer

Answers:

1.Ethical categories involved in the explosion:

-The workers and the managers didnot follow the law ethically and they violated the safety law by not correctly implementing airflow and coal-dust standards in the mine which lead to the explosion

-The CEO has ordered to alert the employees before the federal mine inspectors were on the mine.So that the employees could be aware of the inspection and act accordingly inorder to safeguard them.This is against violation of lawThey used radio systems to alert the employees.

-The CEO also ordered the Mr.Stover to destroy the company records intentionally but by giving a wrong reason to him stating that it would create a space for new records.So destroying the evidence is against the ethical values.Some documents are wrong so that they may get caught during inspection so they destroyed it but this is a crime

-The manager also ordered the workers to lie to the inspection officers inorder to fraud the US federal.Cheating on US federal is a crime and this is against the ethical issue

--The managers conduct is that following the laws would decrease their coal production but this is against law.They should come up other ideas to increase their coal production rather than cheating the law and making profits.

-The major reason for explosion is not following the safety laws and this is a serious ethical issue.Ethical values should be followed in terms of atleast safety measure for employee as they are responsible for employee well being.

2.Mr.stover admitted that he informed about inspection,destroying the records but he was not aware that what he is doing is a crime and he believed that by destroying the records it would create a new space as ordered by his manager .He would not want to commit a crime and give a heartache to the employees and put a misery in their families.He is not going to gain any advantage by commiting this against the law.But he was not aware that what he wass= doing is against the law and his intent was not to commit a crime.He found guilty on knowing about his violation of laws.

3.Yes,CEO is fully accountable for the explosion that happened.He is the one who ordered the president of mine operating unit to violate the safety laws for his own benefit of increasing the coal production.CEO only ordered the managers to alert the employee about the inspection an lie to them about their safety measures.So the main cause for the explosion is violating the safety measures which was also not corrected by the CEO and he also stood by violating the safety measures.CEO should be the one who is responsible for the well being of employee but he didnot care about his employees rather concentrated on increasing the coal production to benefit his company.

-

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse C
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.