Semester 381 Assignment 2 Course Name: Industrial Psychology Course Code: BUS 28

Question

Semester 381 Assignment 2 Course Name: Industrial Psychology Course Code: BUS 283 Section: Student Name Student ID Instructions: 1.Type of Assignment: a. Create a teams (4-5 persons) b. Chose a topic for group discussion from the list provided below I. Training employees 2. Motivating employees 3. Group work .Employee satisfaction 5. Employee commitment 6. Leadershi 7. Stress in the work environment 8. Recruiting new employees e. Imagine that you are the employees of company "ABC and you work in one department (you can choose what kind of department). Each of you is holding specific positions characteristic for this department, but also there is HR manager and supervisor among you. Playing the chosen role prepare the scenario for group discussion and present it. The purpose of the discussion is preparing the recommendations for the company executive how to improve/change the discussed d. Teams are obligated to submit in the day of assignment: cover page, the scenario of the group discussion and recommendations. The time for the discussion 10-15 e.Recommended sources: text book and other sources 2. Grading Rubrics and Allocation of Marks: Grading Criteria Individual Marks Group Marks Organization Addressing Supporting Audiencedetails of Topic Knde Arguments Problems conducting- time c Arguments Problemsplace and Marks 2 20

Explanation / Answer

Discussion on Contingency theoy of leadership

Contingency Theory of leadership can be defined as a quality of a leader to match the specific situation and function of a leader as various contingencies in the form of subordinates or group variables.

Some advantages of contingency style of leadership are as follows

It provides inability to the managers to effectively manage several variables according to their needs. This model provides a number of factors that affect efficiency of the group it provides a basic ability of task oriented leader that can affect the group as long and the group is highly structure as well as have a clearly defined task.

This specific theory is based on very intense research as well as it is curated by some of the best experts of this field. Best intense research contributes into the seriousness of the theory and also provides a very thick base for examination as well as leadership.

Best style gives ability to an organisations for easily identify the best potential leader for a particular group. Best style provide and specific identity of the leader who can leave their coworkers to achieve the main goal set for the group. Leaders with the relationship orientation get easy use their interpersonal skills for providing the better efficiency in the jobs and can be very helpful in dealing with the complex situations when making the decisions.

This type of leadership style is very flexible fodder crops. It gives an ability to the leader for precisely adopting a very wide variety of groups. Leaders and group relationships can also be very much improved by this specific leadership style. For example if the leadership is very low on its human relations skills this a specific leadership style provide an ability via the management to create ineffective groups by providing clear and define task which increases the overall ability of the leader to provide reward or punishment to their participants.

Advantages and limitations of this style are as follows

This efficient leadership style suffers from Insufficient literature. It cannot be used to expel various type of actions which can be taken under different situations. Approach has to be very clear and princess to be processed by this leadership style. It increases the need of a skilled manager in the processes.

In this specific leadership style the suggestion for the approach is very simple. But managing the situation is very complex. Managers have to take multiple decisions according to their leadership style by maintaining the contingency of the given task. Managers are always short of time and this specific leadership style overloads them with the information and this is usually resulted in less efficient work structure.

Agency leadership style is very complex and it always creates problem in texting. Because of the too many factors involved this the specific leadership style is very hard to examine.

Contingency leadership style is basically very reactive in its nature. It defines what managers can do in the given situation for a specific organisation. Managers are always responsible to manage the environment by avoiding the undesirable effects.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse S
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.