Needed help with the topic \"Mattel and Toy Safety\" Answer the questions at the

Question

Needed help with the topic "Mattel and Toy Safety"

Answer the questions at the end of the Case Study, "Mattel and Toy Safety", found on page 531 of the textbook. (business and society)

Mattel and Toy Safety

Answer the questions at the end of the Case Study, "Mattel and Toy Safety", found on page 531 of the textbook.

1) Do you believe that Mattel acted in a socially responsible and ethical manner with regard to the safety of its toys? Why or why not? What should or could Mattel have done differently, if anything?

2) Who or what do you believe was responsible for the fact that children were exposed to potentially dangerous toys? Why do you think so?

Explanation / Answer

1)Answer:

Yes, I do believe that Mattel acted in a socially responsible and ethical manner in this situation. Because the company’s products are designed primarily for children, it must be sensitive to social concerns about children’s rights. It must also be aware that the international environment often complicates business transactions (Mattel, 2013). Mattel made sure that they took precautionary measures by recalling all items that had been contaminated with lead. The Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) stepped in after the few recalls and tried their best to reassure the public that actions were being taken by conducting further testing of imported toys. Mattel could have beefed up inspections of their products more because we are dealing with the lives children, who are innocent and have no idea that their toys are dangerous.

2)Answer:

In the case of Mattel, the company and its Chinese subcontractors should have simultaneously and corporately examined the product quality. However, people know that toys with extra lead and non-standardized magnetic batteries are under the brand name of Mattel, not that of the small Chinese contractors. However, in the end, in my opinion, both Mattel Corporation and government play a big role in responsibility for the fact that children were exposed to potentially dangerous toys. The primary concern of a corporate citizen, which Mattel is known as, is to provide safe products to their final customer: children. If a company fails to deliver safe products to their customer, government has to act and in a timely manner to avoid harmful toys being sold in the USA in compliance with American regulations. In my opinion, government and company are both guilty for the danger of the toys made in China, even knowing that the contractor in China was responsible for exposing children to a high level of lead in the paint of the toys. It should be a primary concern of a corporate citizen and government to protect their populations against imported products which disrespect the local regulations where products aresold

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse N
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.