please help me with the question: executive manager of a Western multinational c
ID: 375015 • Letter: P
Question
please help me with the question: executive manager of a Western multinational corporation, with the objective of raising the value of stocks for investors, moves to one of the African countries to produce a specific fertilizer product. The product is necessary to increase agricultural crops, but at the same time is known to be toxic to the environment and hazardous for human health. However, the value of the stock is dramatically increasing and the output in agriculture has increased drastically from last year. This also means, stockholders are happy with their investment and the farmers are happy for harvesting high yield crops. a) Discuss why the decision of the executive manager is unethical b) Argue why the decision is unstainable considering its long-term effect on the environment, society and the bottom-line itself. c) Suggest how an effective corporate leader will solve this complex problem
Explanation / Answer
This is specific decision of the executive manager is totally unethical as the company is dealing in other country and directly influencing the overall environment of that specific country and also the globe. Does a specific situation directly violates the ethical a loss of commitment towards the environment and Italy decreases the overall liability of the specific company towards the environment. It would definitely leave a long term effect on the too good reduce the overall effectiveness of the fertilizers in the specific society and soil.
Just for benefiting the company and for the benefit of some farmers, enactment of a fertilizer which is harmful for the society is unethical. Local population would be affected by this specific type of pesticides and also it would have long term effects on the same place.
Despite being an unethical decision which have a long term effect on the environment and Society this specific decision is unstainable as it directly increases the profits of farmers. As farmers don't know about severity of the specific pesticides against humanity, considering it as a crop boosting pesticides which is being used by each and every farmer in Africa. It is generating huge revenues by increasing sales as it is very effective in terms of farming. Specific situation makes it unstainable. Industry which is producing this specific fertilizer is also generating greater profits by selling it across the nation and this is specific practice is directly reducing the overall effectiveness of ethics and morals for the society. As the farmers are not aware of the consequences of the pesticides, text available pesticides for them which is demanded in each and every country in Africa. Because of these reasons this decision can be considered as unstainable.
An effective corporate leader definitely would not allow this kind of product to enter any of the country like Africa or any other country. Despite selling this kind of products into the country, leader would find a better development for the fertilizer and would sell that specific type of fertilizer into the society. A good leader would definitely be more ethical towards the society and look into the long term consequences of the same. This would definitely increase the level of implementation towards the organisational structure as well as it would show companies ethics and morals towards the society which maintains social responsibility towards the humanity and the society.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.