Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

! contract price. Welge counterclaimed 207 A.2d 749 (Conn. Cir. Cr.)) of the fur

ID: 375495 • Letter: #

Question

! contract price. Welge counterclaimed 207 A.2d 749 (Conn. Cir. Cr.)) of the furniture. Decide. Baena Brothers v. Welge, by 10. Schroeder parked his car in a parking lot operated Alright, Inc. On the parking stub given him was printed in large, heavy type that the lot closed at 6:00 P.M. Under this information, printed in smaller, ision limiting the liability of right for thefi or loss. A large sign at the lot stated lighter type, was a prov that after 6:00 P.M. patrons could obtain their car keys at another location. Schroeder's car was stolen from the lot sometime after the 6:0 and he sued Allright for damages. Allright defended on the basis of the limitation-of-liability provision contained in the parking stub and the notice given chroeder that the lot closed at 6:00 P.M. Decide.

Explanation / Answer

Two major issues are there:

The parking lot company via a bold notice has clearly displayed that parking lot will be closed after 6 PM and hence, there liability will be limited.