Choose a situation where critical thinking was a failure or success. Examples: H

Question

Choose a situation where critical thinking was a failure or success. Examples: Hurricane Katrina, 911 Attacks, General Custard's Last Stand, The First World Series Game, and so on. Analyze and discuss why the management of the event was a success or failure. Use the following Critical Thinking Template and place the assignment on the discussion board.

Critical Thinking Template

Introduction/Statement of Problem, Situation, or Event: Why this was significant…

Summary: History, what happened, obstacles, special considerations

Objective/Operational Process: What was the intent of the leadership and how it was accomplished or the demise…

Critical Thinking Assessment: Analysis, successful or unsuccessful, concerns…

Closing: Your findings and recommendations...

Sources: List of internet sites, books, articles, charts, interviews, subject matter experts, photos…References used in your documentation…

Explanation / Answer

sea tempest Katrina dashed over the Gulf of Mexico and made landfall in New Orleans, Louisiana. When it was more than, a class 5 storm had ruptured the levees, overflowed 80% of the city, murdered 1,500 individuals, and left more than 80 billion in harms. It was the costliest catastrophic event in US history.

What took after was an undertaking disappointment of colossal extents. It flopped in arranging, it bombed in execution and it flopped in meeting even the most fundamental needs of those got amidst this appalling catastrophe.

While the conditions encompassing this disappointment were absolutely not the same as those encompassing more customary venture disappointments, there is, in any case, a chance to take a gander at Katrina as a task and to think about how exercises from this catastrophe could help counteract disappointments in more ordinary activities.

Four venture administration disappointments emerge.

• Communication

• Selective Perception

• Leadership

• Difficult Relationships

Correspondence

Viably dealing with any venture, particularly one reacting to a crisis circumstance, requests an open correspondence organize through and through. In any case, in the Katrina venture that system was never made. Rather, an unwieldy, restricted, and backhanded framework was in charge of a data logjam of real extents. It was accounted for, for instance, that Federal Emergency Management Chief Michael Brown ("You're completing an incredible activity Brownie") was unwilling to impart data to different offices and that some data never at any point got to his war room.

The capacity to convey is extremely tried when isolate associations must impart and arrange their endeavors. Think about that somewhere around four associations, each with their own particular association societies and solid pioneers, were included.

• White House

• Federal Emergency Management Association (FEMA)

• Department of Homeland Security DHS)

• Louisiana State authorities

• New Orleans Officials.

Maybe the most sensational case of the correspondence disappointment was that it took 24 hours for the White House to affirm that the levees had broken.

Specific Perception

Specific observation happens when chiefs and pioneers hear just what they need to hear and disregard everything else. The helplessness of a city worked underneath ocean level and ensured by disintegrating levees was known for quite a long time. While the likelihood of an immediate hit was little, the results of such an occasion, should it happen, would be appalling. Maybe in light of the fact that the occasion was so improbable or on the grounds that there were different requests on constrained city, state and government assets, nothing was finished. This is a case of specific observation where certain information is helpfully overlooked in light of the fact that it might require activity that those in control are unwilling to take.

Louisiana Congressman, Charlie Melancon, affirming before a US House Committee said that messages composed by the administration's crisis reaction boss Michael Brown, demonstrated a "disappointment in authority." In one email, composed two days after the storm hit, a FEMA worker in New Orleans, wrote to Brown that "the circumstance is past basic." He recorded issues including numerous individuals close passing and sustenance and water running out at the Superdome. Melancon said that Brown's whole reaction was: "A debt of gratitude is in order for the refresh. Anything particular I have to do or change?" The suggestion was that the email from Melancon to Brown was to a great extent overlooked.

Authority

What ended up evident was that neighborhood, state, and government organizations were stumbling over each other for no less than three reasons. The first was that their parts were not unmistakably characterized. The second was that parts and obligations covered, and the third was that additional time was spent in ensuring one's turf than in tending to the necessities of casualties. Subsequently there was extensive disarray over who was in control and what they assumed do.

In the long run, when the US Coast Guard ventured in and forced solid best down control, the conveyance of administrations to the casualties moved forward.

The disappointment of administration was profound to the point that the title of an administration report, "A Failure of Interaction," reasoned that Michael Chertoff, the Secretary of Homeland Security, executed his obligation late, inadequately, or not in any manner.

Troublesome Relationships

Absence of initiative set the phase for troublesome relations among all gatherings. Michael Brown was blamed by a representative for being "resolutely subordinate." Brown affirmed in the Unites States Senate that he figured conversing with Chertoff amid the emergency would be an "exercise in futility." On September 12 Brown surrendered, 10 days after President Bush let him know, "Brownie, you're completing a hell of an occupation."

Exercises Learned

We should be watchful in summing up the undertaking disappointment exercises that can be gained from an once-in-a-hundred-year catastrophe, yet the size of the disappointment was great to the point that it turns into a cartoon of what can turn out badly in more regular activities.

• The more constituents included, the more prominent will be the correspondence challenge. Except if oversaw successfully, a great deal excessively time can be given to settling jurisdictional clashes and insufficient time on the main problems. An excessive number of constituents can undermine a task

• Be cautious of specific observation. When it goes unchecked it very well may be successful in miminizing interuptions, however the consequnces of locking out new information can be awful.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse C
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.