As a new strategy this year, Highto Company is having its managers evaluated by

Question

As a new strategy this year, Highto Company is having its managers evaluated by the members of their leams. This decision was made to give employees an opportunity to anonymousty share information about how they are being managed. HighLo most Skely has not considered that this type of performance evaluation has which disadvantage? Select one or more: A. Subordinates tend to focus only on aspects of their manager's performance that are measured, neglecting those that are not B Subordinates do not have adequate opportunity to observe a managers interactions and behavior C.Friendship has the potential to bias ratings D. Subordinates have power over their managers, thus putting the managers in a difficult situation E. Subordinales find the situation of being both rater and ratee uncomfortable when the evaluations are made for administrative decisions

Explanation / Answer

A) This will be a disadvantage as the subordiantes will have a narrow vision towards how they are being managed.

B) Not a disadvantage. The statement is incorrect. I feel subordinates have various touchpoints to evaluate a manager.

C) If the subordinate has a good rapport with the manager, h/she may rate things positively irrespective of how h/she is being managed.

D) Though it is a difficult situation, managers have a chance to improve based on feedback. This benefits everyone and hence not a disadvantage.

E) This is a possible disadvantage. Though it is anonymous, any manager finding about poor ratings from subordinates may take it out in the rating of subordinates.

Choose A, C and E

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse A
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.