Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

the interpretation given to the principles of justice earlier is perhaps natural

ID: 394757 • Letter: T

Question

the interpretation given to the principles of justice earlier is perhaps natural Moreover, it seems clear how the principle of utility can be interpreted; it is the ough the Laplacean principle for choice uncertainty. (For a discussion of these choice R. D. Luce and H. Raiffa, Games and Decisions New York: Wiley [1957], pp. 2 Example E von Hayek, The Constitution of Liberty (1960), p. 90 Chicago; U. of Ch 4. See N. Kaldor, An Expenditure Tax (1955) London: Allen & Unwin. The Entitlement Theory ROBERT NOZICK state more extensive violates people's rights. Yet many persons have hu forth reasons purporting to justify a more extensive state. It is impossi within the compass of this book to examine all the reasons t been put forth. Therefore, I shall focus upon those generally acknowl edged to be most weighty and influential, to see precisely wherein they fail. In justified, because necessary (or the best instrument) to achieve distributive justice; put hat h this chapter we consider the claim that a more extensive state is The term "distributive justice" is not a neutral one. Hearing the term "distribution," most people presume that some thing or mechanism uses some principle or criterion to give out a supply of things. Into this process of distributing shares some error may have crept. So it is an open question, at least, whether redistribution should take place; whether we should do again what has already been done once, though poorly. However, we are not in the position of children who have been given portions of pie by someon who now makes last-minute adjustments to rectify careless cutting. There no central distribution, no person or group entitled to control all t sources, jointly deciding how they are to be doled out. What each person gets, he gets from others who give to him in exchange for something, or as a gift. In a free society, diverse persons control different resources, and new holdings arise out of the voluntary exchanges and actions of persons. is no more a distributing or distribution of shares than there is a distribul- ng of mates in a society in which persons choose whom they shall marry The total result is the product of many individual decisions which the di fe rent individuals involved are entitled to make. Some uses of the ternm t Theory," from nd Utopia by Robert Nozick. Copy 1974 by BasicBooks, Inc. Reprinted by permission of BasicBooks, a subsi Group, LLC. Books diary of

Explanation / Answer

Entitlement theory is a theory of distributive justice and private property propagated by American Philosopher Robert Nozick.

About Author:

Robert Nozicks is an American philosopher who was born in new York, USA. He is best known for his books “Philosophical Explanation”, “Anarchy, State and Utopia” & “invariances”.

Summary:

Entitlement Theory is a theory which propagates how property should be held when viewed from principle of justice. It is based on 3 main principles namely Principle of Justice in acquisition, principle of Justice in transfer, Principle of rectification of Injustice.

Principle of Justice in Acquisition speaks about how people first come to own unowned property and what kind of property can people own.

Principle of Justice in transfer speaks about how people can exchange holdings from others in the form of exchanges for other property and gifts. This principles speaks about transfer of property from one person to another for various reasons like death, emergency needs etc..

Principle of Rectification of Injustice speaks about rectification action which needs to be taken when there is injustice in acquiring property or while transferring property.

According to Robert Nozicks if first two principles are followed correctly the third principle need not be applied, but since world is greedy for acquiring property people tend to cheat others and acquire property.

The entitlement theory speaks about the nature and defects of other conceptions of distributive theories like time slice principle of justice.