Krista Acklen was the “golden girl” of a metropolitan government in a large midw
ID: 395437 • Letter: K
Question
Krista Acklen was the “golden girl” of a metropolitan government in a large midwest- ern city. The top graduate of a local high school, she studied in France and interned at Vogue in Paris before returning to the States for an MBA and a position with a top New York PR firm. She knew everyone, and chatting with or doing lunch with the rich and famous was a normal day for Krista.The only child of a single mom, Krista dropped it all and eagerly returned to her midwestern hometown when her mother’s health declined suddenly. She had barely settled in and established home care for her mother when the mayor’s office contacted her with a job proposal. Would Krista consider a position developing and directing a public art program for the city? She enthusiastically accepted the job. With her win- ning connections, drive, and abilities, she quickly expanded her mission to develop a range of arts programs. Donations and grant money poured into programs under her established 501(c) 3 organization developed as a friend’s organization for city parks. Headquarters for Acklen and her staff was a comfortable unused third floor space in the city library, which used to hold books and magazines that were now stored digitally.
Acklen was curious to learn why John Mitchell, director of parks and recreation, had summoned her to a meeting “to learn of a decision I have made that will affect your group.” Knowing that budget factors recently forced reduction in staff and office space throughout city government, and aware of the importance of dealing carefully with public opinion as well as the feelings of employees and other stakeholders, Acklen felt she was prepared for any decision Mitchell might have reached.
She tried to get comfortable in the chair across from Mitchell, who seemed ill at ease. Avoiding small talk, Mitchell said that he intentionally did not discuss the deci- sion in advance because he believed Acklen would object. He would not accept her objections anyway, he indicated, so the decision was final.
“What is the decision?” queried Acklen.
“The mayor wants half of your group’s office space for the Greenways project,” Mitchell replied, “and I see no alternative except for you to agree. The mayor’s idea makes sense and you must go along.”
Acklen felt fury rising within her chest as she stared at Mitchell while thinking to herself, “This people-pleasing, brown-nosing jerk. He will do anything to win the mayor’s favor.”
The Greenways project, directed by Lisa Todd, had developed a number of beauti- ful areas throughout the city. In recent years, Greenways had received the bulk of new money and attention from the federal government, and Todd’s staff had grown with the additional funding and development projects.
As Acklen regained her composure, she shot back at Mitchell. “Not consulting me on this is unacceptable. I should be part of any decision affecting my staff and program. I could have helped plan a solution that worked for everyone.” Mitchell tried to speak, but Acklen kept going. “You have a responsibility to my group as well as to the mayor. I think you are giving us the shaft as an easy way to please her.”
The two argued a while longer, but Mitchell wouldn’t budge. Finally, Acklen said, “John, since this was your decision, you should be the one to tell my people. You better come over soon before the word gets out.”
“No,” Mitchell said, “you are their immediate boss. You have to tell them. That’s your job. Where is your team spirit, anyway?”
Acklen returned to her office and seethed to Joanne Franklin, her most senior employee. “Oh no,” Joanne moaned. “We really need all this space. Our program is growing, too.”
Acklen agreed, as she explained Mitchell’s support of the suggestion from the mayor’s office to make additional office space available to Lisa Todd and her staff. Joanne started brainstorming. “I suppose we could pair up in the offices.”
Acklen shook her head. “We are team players. But John Mitchell and the mayor need to know that this was not handled in a way that shows respect for our employees.” After a pause she continued, “I’m too frazzled to think about it anymore today. Let’s talk about this tomorrow.
Discussion Questions
1. What mistakes do you think John Mitchell made with the way he solved the problem of limited office space? Explain.
2. What approach would you have used if you were Mitchell? Why?
3. What are Krista Acklen’s options for responding to Mitchell’s decision? What should she do now? Why?
Explanation / Answer
1) I believe that John Mitchell could have taken care of along these lines better. Rather than counselling with Krista Acklen, he kept her out and settled on the choice. I believe that if he somehow happened to incorporate her they could've cooperated on concocting an elective arrangement or trading off. Also, regardless of whether they couldn't concoct whatever else, she would have in any event felt like she was associated with the basic leadership process.
2) My approach would be way extraordinary, if I was John Mitchell. Leading I would have moved toward Krista Acklen before consenting to chairman's thought regarding sharing the constrained office space that she is accountable for before choosing exclusively dismissing her sources of info or considerations. I would search for more potential outcomes, assembling all the accessible data, considering every one of the options and their outcomes would considered before claiming any choice made, will affect Acklen and her group, so it is imperative that she is included. I would have conceptualized with her to take a gander at the different alternatives that might be accessible to us. Regardless of whether we at long last come to common choice to share the workplace space with the other group, it will be a commonly concurred that the two groups are cheerful, are sufficiently given regard and thought into the circumstance.
3) It doesn't appear as though she has numerous choices with respect to Mitchell's choice. If she doesn't go along, she might be liable to discipline. If she consents but is rude to the Greenways venture, it'll make an antagonistic workplace. On the other hand, I don't really figure she ought to just acknowledge the choice without disclosing to Mitchell her issues. She may get steamrolled by Mitchell later, because he may consider her to be a sucker. I think the best game-plan for Acken to take is to change her office space to suit the Greenways venture. Moreover, I figure she should request to meet with Mitchell to clarify that she didn't acknowledge how he took care of the circumstance, and might want to be a piece of choices that specifically influence her gathering later on. On the off chance that he differs or declines, she can go to the following individual in control and clarify the issue.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.