Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

•From Chapter 1 of the textbook, President Wilson asserted that it is “harder to

ID: 405929 • Letter: #

Question

•From Chapter 1 of the textbook, President Wilson asserted that it is “harder to run a constitution than to frame one.” From the first e-Activity, suggest two (2) examples of difficulties that exist in either the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government today that bolster Wilson’s assertion

•Organize the three (3) basic forms of government from the point of view of a public administrator. Suggest two to three (2-3) common goals and interdependencies of the forms of government in question. Provide a rationale to support your response. •

From the second e-Activity, select two (2) new policies that the Obama administration is presently implementing. Next, from the third e-Activity, speculate on whether or not the policies that you have selected would have positive or negative impacts on the new federalism. Justify your response. •Analyze the main types of federalism. Debate two to three (2-3) advantages and two to three (2-3) disadvantages of federalism as it relates to intergovernmental relations. Provide a rationale to support your response.

Explanation / Answer

From Chapter 1 of the textbook, President Wilson asserted that it is “harder to run a constitution than to frame one.” From the first e-Activity, suggest two (2) examples of difficulties that exist in either the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government today that bolster Wilson’s assertion.

Although a scholar at the time his essay was written, Woodrow Wilson was very much on point in addressing the government's shortcomings. The one issue he spoke on that seems to be a fixture within today's government at any level, is corruption. Politicians and elected officials taking part in moral perversion is business as usual.

Some of the difficulties that exist in either the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government today, can be attributed to egos and ulterior motives. Resolving vitally important issues such as a failing economy, and health care is always a long drawn out process of hold outs and walk outs, that in the end never benefits Joseph or Josephine Public.

Analyze the main types of federalism. Debate two to three (2-3) advantages and two to three (2-3) disadvantages of federalism as it relates to intergovernmental relations. Provide a rationale to support your response.

Dual federalism (1790s to 1930s): Also known as layer cake federalism, dual federalism refers to a system in which the two levels of government operate separately, and is pretty much the bog-standard definition of how the framers intended it to be interpreted. The powers of government are split between the federal and state levels in order to preserve a balance between the two.

Co-operative federalism (around 1930 to 1960): This system, also called marble cake federalism, implies that the federal and state governments share power equally in order to resolve common problems collectively and was popular all the way through the Great Depression, the Second World War, the Cold War and up until the 1960s. During these testing times, the country needed the two levels of government to work together. Lines between the two governments’ powers are blurred within this approach.

Creative federalism (approximately 1960 to 1980): Also known as picket fence federalism, creative federalism allows the federal government to decide what the states need, and then provide them with the resources. It shifted power to the federal government, and is evidenced in the Johnson administration’s social and welfare reforms in the 1960s, whereby federal funding to states was contingent on adopting a series of federally determined objectives.

New federalism (around 1980 to 2001): In response to the states’ loss of power during creative federalism, new federalism included a reassertion of powers going back to the state and local governments in order to create a new balance between the two. One principal vehicle for this shift was to remove the conditionality on federally provided block grants to enable states to choose how to prioritize what they should be spent on.

Advantages:

Disadvantages:

Refernces:

Skoutaris, N. (2011). From Dual to Cooperative Federalism: The Changing Structure of European Law. European Constitutional Law Review, 7(2), 325-331. doi:10.1017/S1574019611200105

http://www.sparknotes.com/us-government-and-politics/american-government/federalism/section4.rhtml