assault, and robbery. To the extent that criminals are rational, these higher co
ID: 410916 • Letter: A
Question
assault, and robbery. To the extent that criminals are rational, these higher costs are predicted to reduce crime rates. The key point, however, is that the handguns must be concealed Consider, instead, a law that allows individuals to carry handguns, but only if clearly displayed on the body. Criminals in sizing up their potential victims, then, are likely to avoid tangling with obviously armed individuals and focus their efforts against easier prey. This is the diversion effect of private security measures discussed above. Crime will not be deterred, but simply diverted from the armed victim to the unarmed one. If individuals are allowed to carry concealed handguns, on the other hand, criminals will face a higher probability of any potential victim being armed. Not only do individuals who carry the weapons benefit, but so do other individuals. Just as seen in the case of the Lojack security device used to discourage car thieves, shall-issue laws have the ability to reduce the violent crime rate But the theoretical effects of shall-issue laws on the overall crime rate are ambiguous. Crime diversion across victims is only one kind of substitution criminals may consider. There is also the possibility that shall-issue laws will divert criminals from committing violent crimes toward committing nonviolent crimes. Ifmore potential victims are carrying weapons, a criminal may decide that the costs of mugging someone are now too high, and decide instead to become a burglar or car thief. So, to evaluate the effects ofshall-issue laws on the crime rate, it appears that the potential reduction in violent crimes must be weighed against the potential increase in nonviolent crimes. However, there are other factors to consider that suggest the violent crime rate may increase with the adoption of shall-issue laws First, the easier it is to secure a legal gun permit the easier it may be for criminals or potential criminals to get guns. Even with safeguards in place to restrict shall issue permits, there may be dangerous individuals who will be able to satisfy whatever restrictions are in place. Second, individuals who are legally able to carry guns may decide to sell guns, or may have their guns stolen, by criminals who cannot get legal permits. Third, the more guns there are the more likely there will be gun-related accidents, suicides, and spontaneous acts of rage that turn deadly. Finally, to the extent that there are more armed potential victims, criminals may decide to escalate the use of violence themselves when committing crimes In 1997 an important study (Lott and Mustard, 1997) was published on the effect of shall-issue laws on the crime rate. The authors of the study attempt to address a simple question - Do shall-issue laws reduce or increase the crime rate? They reach an explicit conclusion Our evidence implies that concealed handguns are the most cost-effective method of reducing crime thus far analyzed by economists, providing a higher return than increased law enforcement or incarceration, other private security devices, or social programsExplanation / Answer
In this people will be motivated to use the gun. It is assumed that people should clearly display their gun on the body in order, then criminals will avoid to attack them and their more focus will be on ungunned people. But if people will carry concealed handgun then criminals will not know who has the gun and then they will think alot before attacking.This will help in reducing the number of crime
Theoretically shall issue will reduce the number of crime but actually voilent crime will reduce and non-voilent crime will increase. Like criminal will prefer to car thief then burglar.Overall crime will not get reduced, just change in category
In shall issue law permit criteria can be made strict so that criminals will not be able to get gun but they can get from licensed user either by theif or buying their gun. Number of accident with guns will get increased like suicides , accidents etc. In order this will help in one way but in other manner it will harm the society
As per Lott and Mustard study if shall issue will reduce crime or not . They found that best solution is concealed hadnguns and it will help in reducing the crime
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.