Most people will say that quality is important, but it might not always be the m

Question

Most people will say that quality is important, but it might not always be the most important thing. We can see this play out, particularly, when projects are running behind or are over budget. Quality control efforts are often one of the first things to go by the wayside because they take up resources (e.g., people, time, and funds). But with your training and experience, you already see this coming. How do you address these quality-related issues with your team and with your senior leadership?

Explanation / Answer

When you start working on a project, there always needs to be a timeline for the project to be created such that it ensures the maximum efficiency of the Project. The timeline could be from few hours to even few years, depending upon the criticality of the Project. However, timeline helps in estimating the resources and time required to achieve the same and thereby, creating a discipline to ensure the completion of the project in that time. All projects need to be completed within the given time otherwise the essence of it is lost. But in the case, where the Projects are prone to uncertainties, then certain strategies could be worked out or pre-decided in order to be still determined to achieve the same. However, compromising with the quality of the project can cost the Project team as well as to the user of the Project, dearly. Either claiming lives of the people or simply making the entire project unsuitable for utility, the quality defects could have an adverse impact upon both, the reputation of the Project team and the Company as well as upon its customers or users. Hence, the first thing that needs to be addressed here with regards to the quality-related issues, is how to maintain the timeline of the Project or given the exigencies, how to push the same so that the quality is not compromised upon.

Therefore, if I were a Project manager who realizes that the project may not be able to be completed in that time that I would go for re-planning the work which is certainly required in order to ensure the feasibility of completing the project even within the time that was earlier determined. If in re-planning, it is found out that employing of additional resources could ensure the completion of the Project on time, then the same could be undertaken using various techniques. However, if there are certain activities in the process that cannot be crashed down and are critical in nature, then possibilities of delay may be inevitable. Hence as a Project manager, I would prefer a re-plan to evaluate the Project once again.

Accordingly, I may recommend a Critical Path Method. Critical Path Method technique is especially undertaken to analyze the complex issues pertaining to the Time management, by differentiating the Critical activities from that of the non-critical ones in order to in order to ensure the smooth implementation of processes. The Critical Path Method helps in determining the float i.e. the slack time in the field of the Critical path with any slip in it causing an overall delay in the whole process. I would analyze the condition on the basis of the floats in the critical path. If an activity has few floats in the Project process, on a Critical path method instead of desired zero float, then that would mean that there would be many slacks in the process that could result into delay if all such floats are on the Critical Path Method and hence in such a case, the completion schedule could not be met.. But if these floats do not fall on the Critical path but on the non-critical paths instead, then the total float on the non-critical path needs to be calculated in order to ascertain critical path drag of an activity i.e. the total amount of time that is added in the overall activity. Then, all these floats need to be added to the critical path method to ascertain the Project’s duration.

Apart from this, I could also re-plan and work upon the following:

Next, we need to also ensure that certain Quality techniques are in place that ensures a mandatory continuous monitoring of the quality within the Project. For eg., Total Quality Management. Total Quality Management is a philosophy that involves everyone in the organization in a continual effort to improve quality and achieve customer satisfaction. Hence with Total Quality Management in place, the Organization works together to guarantee Quality services to all its stakeholders. For this, it may use various tools such as Six Sigma which is a statistical program undertaken by the Organization for the process improvement. It has six standards that is set to reduce defects to 3.4 per million, thereby helping in identifying and mitigating any variances in the system. It is a customer-centric approach to cater the requirements of the end-users.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse M
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.