One focus of the questions was the secondary ethical values that are present in
ID: 424713 • Letter: O
Question
One focus of the questions was the secondary ethical values that are present in a decision. A secondary value for the Responsibilities Lens is truthfulness and transparency. A secondary value for the Results Lens is maximizing satisfaction and loyalty. For the Relationship Lens, the secondary values are having fair treatment for all and placing blame where deserved. For the Reputation Lens, the secondary values are integrity and civility. Did you find these more common ethical traits useful as you thought about how to make a decision? Why or why not? Did checking against more than one list help you with a decision?
Each ethical lens has a slightly different justification for taking an action. One might say "I was doing my duty." Another might say "It's a win-win solution." Yet another justifies their action by saying, "I wanted to make sure everyone was treated the same." Finally, the last one might say, "That decision was the best for everyone." As you reflect on the various questions that you answered in this exercise, did you find that looking at the problem from multiple lenses helped you clarify your decision or did the multiple vantage points make the process more difficult?
Explanation / Answer
Answer:
One focus of the questions was the secondary ethical values that are present in a decision. A secondary value for the Responsibilities Lens is truthfulness and transparency. A secondary value for the Results Lens is maximizing satisfaction and loyalty. For the Relationship Lens, the secondary values are having fair treatment for all and placing blame where deserved. For the Reputation Lens, the secondary values are integrity and civility.
Yes, we found that these more common ethical traits are useful as we thought about how to make a decision. Because the result of any decision should reflect the ethical outcome and it should be acceptable to a common people. It should show the fairness and general decision outcome from a common men’s perspective. The secondary trait values are the desired expectations from any decision, so that the decision will result in more fruitful outcome for the affected people.
Yes, checking against more than one list will help us with a decision because more than one list will help us to review from another angle and we can have review from an overall perspective, so that we can avoid any major issue. But the list should not be much long, as it will make the decision complex and we will not be able to make the decision. So the list should contain the prioritized factors affecting the decision process.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Each ethical lens has a slightly different justification for taking an action. One might say "I was doing my duty." Another might say "It's a win-win solution." Yet another justifies their action by saying, "I wanted to make sure everyone was treated the same." Finally, the last one might say, "That decision was the best for everyone."
Yes, we found that looking at the problem from multiple lenses helped us in clarifying our decision because this decision is a refined decision which will be suitable for most of the angles. But there is an associated problem with it and we cannot make a decision which is suitable for all multiple lenses, so in this case, we need to look from the prioritized lenses and consider prioritized lenses view before taking the decision.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.