one or two sentence response identifying the fallacy in each of the following Wr
ID: 428026 • Letter: O
Question
one or two sentence response identifying the fallacy in each of the following Write a short, statements. Justity your answer. Your answers must follow these rules: 17. The classical Chinese explanation is that channels of energy run in regular patterns through the body and over its surface. These energy channels, called meridians, are like rivers flowing through the like a body to irrigate and nourish the tissues. An obstruction in the movement of these energy rivers is dam that backs up in others - The American Academy of Medical Acupuncture Answer 18. Oils that are applied to the skin are believed to be absorbed into the bloodstream. The components of the various oils are believed to aid in a variety of health, beauty and hygiene conditions. - Aromaweb, touting the benefits of Aromatherapy Answer 19. We can clearly see archi-writing, depending on the author, and this multireferential, multi-dimensional machinic catalysis. The symmetry of scale, the transversality, the pathic non-discursive character of their expansion: all these dimensions remove us from the logic of the excluded middle and reinforce us in our dismissal of the ontological binarism we criticised previously. French philosopher Félix Guattari that there is no bi-univocal correspondence between linear signifying links or Answer 20. One explanation why some researchers have failed to replicate these positive results could be that their tests are not valid. - Douglas Biklen, explaining tests that disproved facilitated communication. AnswerExplanation / Answer
17. The fallacy in this statement is that the energy rivers or energy channels that runs through the body and over its surface is equally beneficial to everyone. The positive impact of meridians may differ from person to person in terms of quantum and impact.
18. The fallacy in this statement is the assumption that oil applied to the skin is absorbed in the bloodstream. Many a times the oil is absorbed by the skin tissues itself and fails to reach the bloodstream.
19. The fallacy in this statement is that all authors use a multireferential, multi-dimensional machinic catalysis. In fact many authors also avoid making use of bi-univocal correspondence and reference points.
20. It is a fallacy here to assume that the tests are not valid. Failure to replicate positive results cannot be solely attributed to validity of tests, it may depend on a host of other factors as well.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.