Case 1: The Recalcitrant Director at Byte Products Inc.: Corporate Legality vers

Question

Case 1: The Recalcitrant Director at Byte Products Inc.: Corporate Legality versus Corporate Responsibility (Corporate Governance: Executive Leadership)

Conduct a strategic analysis using the Executive Summary template. Prepare and submit a two page executive summary that discusses what strategic alternatives are available and provide a recommended strategy.

You are to work alone to analyze and prepare the Executive Summary for the case. NOTE: Click "Submit Assignment" in the upper right hand corner of your screen to turn in your Executive Summary no later than Sunday, midnight CT. Name your file with your name and the unit number, i.e. Jones1 or Brown1. Your file should be in either Microsoft word (.doc or .docx) or rich text (.rtf) format.

The following information will be required for the Executive Summary:  TEXTBOOK CASE ANALYSIS GUIDANCE(CAG) and the TEXTBOOK BUSINESS CASE ANALYSIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TEMPLATE These files are required for the unit textbook case studies.

Synopsis of the Case: The content of the synopsis should present relevant background facts about the case under examination.

Relevant Factual Information about the Problem or Decision the Organization Faced: State the precise problem or decision the organization faced. The section should include information that addressed the business issue under examination. This section should be no longer than a single paragraph.

Explanation of Relevant Concepts, Theories and Applications Derived from Course Materials:  This section should be the bulk of your paper. Analysis of the business problem or decision in light of the course concepts must be presented, as well as the business lesson another organization could learn from this situation. Besides citation to the text, learners must conduct research in the University library related to the top. Citing the textbook only is not enough to demonstrate you understand and can apply the course objectives. Here is where comparative and contrasting positions should be considered and examples and illustrations provided.

Recommendations: Provide logical recommendations to address the business lesson identified above. The recommendations need not to be specific to the organization examined, but should consider how other organizations, if similarly situated, could lessen the impact of the problem or decision identified. Recall, that the organization under examination has already moved pasted this problem so any recommendations made, at this point, are fruitless. The focus of this section should be on what other companies should be aware of to address similar problems or decisions. Citation to the textbook alone is insufficient for analysis in this section. Learners should conduct research in the University’s library to support their positions. Depth of scholarship is not demonstrated by providing personal opinions alone, but by using examples, analogies, comparison and illustrations from the academic literature. Not only does this synthesize the material to assist the reader’s understanding, it is an effective way to present the academic sources and extend the discussion of your ideas. This section should be a paragraph or two.

Alternative Recommendations: This section is not a continuation of the prior. Provide suggestions for how to avoid the problem or decision the examined organization faced. Analysis here should be may be forward- thinking, predictive or, most likely, preventative in nature but tied to the thesis statement. Again, opinion is insufficient to provide the required academic analysis. Sources, other than the text, must be provided to sustain the statements made. This section should be a paragraph, at most.

Conclusion: End the assignment with a summary of the important points made in the document. No new information may be presented. Writing a conclusion can be done by rewording the opening or reformulation the topic sentences of each paragraph to make a summary for the reader. This section should be a paragraph, at most.

Explanation / Answer

Ans.

The proposed plant would definitely have a good impact on the production of Byte for quite some time. How ever the promoters can be affected by this move in the long run. The main reason for this is non functioning of the plant after 3 years. The company would be investing a lot in terms of corporate social responsibility like building of schools, hospitals and other facilities for its employees. However, they have to leave all of this after 3 years which would be not good for the company.

The main things which are important for company’s success is its low production cost and high profitability which they can get in Plain Ville. But what about the after effects of the plant. Their wont be any kind of employment in the region and the whole system of taxation and other kinds of biological effects can be seen in the plant and its locality. Thus from the company’s point of view it would be profitable but from people and society point of view it would be harmful.

Employees who would be working in Plain villa would be most affected by the production issues. The would not be having any kind of future after 3 years and thus it would really be sad from their point f view. They would be giving their bets time to the company and on return we would leave them abandoned after some time.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse C
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.