Below there is case scenerio about national origin discrimination, I would like

Question

Below there is case scenerio about national origin discrimination, I would like to expect what the issue, the rule, analysis, and conclusion are in that case scenerio? So, can you evaluate the case scenario relating to the instructions below which are issue, rule, analysis and conclusion.

Case Scenario: On April 12, 1993, Mehmet Bahadirli sought employment as a pizza delivery person at the Westgate Parkway store, a Domino's pizza franchise in Dothan, Alabama. According to the plaintiff, he visiting the store and was told that he was well qualified for the position, but he never received work regarding the job. The plaintiff alleges that on his return to the store around April 25, 1993, he was told that he would not be hired for the position. According to the plaintiff, in the interim four other individuals were hired at the Westgate Parkway store. According to Clarkfinn, plaintiff was told that the application had been misfiled and that the Westgate Parkway store did not have any openings. Bahadirli contends that on learning he would not be hired, he went directly him and asked his wife to call the shop and inquire about employment. Plaintiff alleges his wife was offered a position over the phone. Clarkfinn is the corporate entity that owns the Domino's Pizza franchise at issue here. Mr. Clark owns 75% of Clarkfinn's stock and serves as the corporation's president. The issue is whether the franchisor or the franchisee is ultimately responsible for the discriminatory acts. Instructions Prepare a case brief of the above case scenario. Identify the issue, rule(s), analysis, and conclusion. Please use the headings in your case brief write-up as shown below Issue: The issue should be a one-sentence statement that identifies what the problem the key players (HR managers or a court) may need to decide. Rule: The rule should be identified based on the readings. A rule of law will apply to the case scenario facts. Please identify the correct rule that should apply and cite the rule. Analysis: This section shows that you can apply the rule to the facts of the case to resolve the issue. Conclusion: Properly conclude how the case should be resolved

Explanation / Answer

Issue: Mehmet Bahadirli - Westgate Parkway Store, Alabama

National Origin Discrimination: Not hired owing to National Origin

Rule

Analysis

Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 forbids discrimination when it comes to the pay, firing, hiring, promotions, job assignments, training, layoffs, fringe benefits, and, other terms of employment. They can also not be treated unfairly owing to their association or marriage to a person of a certain origin.

Mehmet Bahadirli went to the store on April 12, 1993, and, April 25, 1993; he was told he was well qualified but was later not offered a job. He was told that there were no openings at the store while he believes four individuals were hired in the interim.

He asked his wife to inquire about employment at the store; she was told she can be hired by the store.

Conclusion

Mehmet Bahadirli was being discriminated against. The firm will have to follow an anti-discrimination policy, and, will have to pay a certain compensation as decided by the court to settle the discrimination suit.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse B
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.