The “color of law” principal relative to 1983 actions? A. Is clearly distinguish
ID: 460770 • Letter: T
Question
The “color of law” principal relative to 1983 actions?
A. Is clearly distinguishable and there is a bright line when the public official is acting privately or clocked with the authority of the state
B. Does not apply if the police officer is working off duty on a “detail” outside a bar in his/her uniform, wearing their badge and using their assigned equipment and marked patrol car issued to them by the police department and makes an arrest of a suspect who is drunk at a bar.
C. Is the process of determining if the law, under which the individual is being arrested under by the police officer, is constitutional or not
D. None of the answers provided for this question are correct
A. Is clearly distinguishable and there is a bright line when the public official is acting privately or clocked with the authority of the state
B. Does not apply if the police officer is working off duty on a “detail” outside a bar in his/her uniform, wearing their badge and using their assigned equipment and marked patrol car issued to them by the police department and makes an arrest of a suspect who is drunk at a bar.
C. Is the process of determining if the law, under which the individual is being arrested under by the police officer, is constitutional or not
D. None of the answers provided for this question are correct
Explanation / Answer
Ans: The “color of law” principal relative to 1983 actions?
C. Is the process of determining if the law, under which the individual is being arrested under by the police officer, is constitutional or not
Under color of law
Color of law alludes to an appearance of legitimate energy to act yet which may work infringing upon law. For instance, however a cop demonstrations with the Color of law power to capture somebody, if such a capture is made without reasonable justification the capture may really be disregarding law.
If a man is approved by a law it's under color of law, in the event that they're not it's more troublesome
Ex; binding somebody to the stocks, not recorded, but rather it might even now be an unwritten implicit rules
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.