Q: Address two competing values mentioned in the article and their different pri
ID: 461729 • Letter: Q
Question
Q: Address two competing values mentioned in the article and their different prioritizations of values and how this creates ethical dilemmas and disagreements?
Five perspectives mentioned in the article are:
1. A contractarian perspective
2. A utilitarian perspective
3. An animal rights perspective
4. Respect for nature perspectives
5. A contextual (or relational view)
The article is -- Ethics of Wildlife Management and Conservation: What Should We Try to Protect by Christian Gamborg, Clare Palmer, & Peter Sandoe 2012 Nature Edition [Internet]
Explanation / Answer
Two competing values are wild life management and nature management.
Now a day human beings concentrated expanding their demands with hi tech technology though they never forget to demand more land and water while constructing house human started to destroy the forest and its related place, this is baseline for destroy of animals and nature because most of wild animals and birds would live in forest if it is destroyed wild animals and birds also get destroy moreover human killed wild animals for its skin to make product then sell to her/his customers.
Due to industries chemical wastage and petroleum, diesel was used by the people for their vehicles; these make pollution to the water, land, sound etc and resulted made a hole on ozone layer that leads to increase the sun temperature so that ocean, sea, lakes were melted can caused for other natural disaster.
To protect the wild life management and nature management the social workers had created some rules and regulation that should be maintained for growth of wild life and nature.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.