ccording to the court’s holding in the Diaz case (pp. 154 et seq), which of the

Question

ccording to the court’s holding in the Diaz case (pp. 154 et seq), which of the following, if any, are predicates for the permissible exercise of sex discrimination in the context of employment? a.That the particular ability or characteristic sought is necessary to the business and not merely tangential or peripheral

b.That it is impractical to consider individually or test individually members of the discriminated-against sex to determine whether an individual possesses the ability or characteristic sought. c.both a and b.

d. None of the above.

Explanation / Answer

c.both a and b.

the particular ability or characteristic sought is necessary to the business and not merely tangential or peripheral and it is impractical to consider individually or test individually members of the discriminated-against sex to determine whether an individual possesses the ability or characteristic sought.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse C
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.