ight s F.2d 598 (7th Cir. 1984)] also claims the bylaw is a means of fixing pric
ID: 462321 • Letter: I
Question
ight s F.2d 598 (7th Cir. 1984)] also claims the bylaw is a means of fixing prices. Is he right? [Harold Vogel v American Society of Appraisers, 744 klocker, Inc, is a print 2. Booklocker, Inc., is a print-on-demand (POD) book company that specializes in handling the printing of a run of books when there is an online order for those books. Amazon.com facilitated such orders by having customers pay up front for a print run and then placing the order with a POD company. Amazon is the domi- nant channel for those who wish to order books that areExplanation / Answer
According to Amazon, BookLocker's Complaint must be dismissed because it fails to sufficiently allege the generic requirements for a cause of action brought under § 1 of the Sherman Act: 1) an agreement between two or more actors, and 2) the actors' agreement must involve either restrictions that are per se illegal or restraints of trade that fail scrutiny under the rule of reason. Id. at 3 (citing Euromodas, 368 F.3d at 16). According to "Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits a seller from `tying' the sale of one product to the purchase of a second product if the seller thereby avoids competition on the merits of the `tied' product."
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.