If the scientific test of a scientific theory is accepted by the community of me

Question

If the scientific test of a scientific theory is accepted by the community of men and women who are called scientists, does that mean that anything is acceptable as long as enough of the right people agree with it? Does that mean there is no such thing as scientific truth? How, if at all, does science differ from politics, art, or religion?

Why do you think there is such a divide between Science and Religion? Can we truly support both? Can technology be the missing link between Science and Religion?

Explanation / Answer

Science involves the method of testing the laws and not deducing them according to Hawking. There is a process to evaluate the findings of the scientist and not depend on the popular notion of agreement or support for the theory. There needs to a standard research process to undertake the research and review it. It can be challenged by the scientists or people in the related field of research. There is an adoption of a critical method for the rest of the community related to the science and research field to evaluate the work. This is essential so the work is not fabricated and the credibility is maintained. There is involvement of empirical and measurable evidence to the research subject. It is depended on the principles of reasoning with a proposal of hypotheses through predictions. The task of a scientist is to observe reality and real events. Thus make statement which can be observed and hypothesize the law and test it.

Science is dependent on evidence, objective observations derived from controlled experiments, development of theories, testing them, gathering evidence which supports or discredits the theories.
Art gives importance to feelings or ideas of an individual and it is individualistic. It is produced for the sake of purity of expression. It is supposed to be aesthetically appealing and pleasing. While science focuses on be demonstrable, replicable and to be able to derive conclusions. There is no compulsion or need for science to be aesthetically appealing or beautiful, emotionally satisfying. There is importance given to imagination in the field of art. It is not restricted to scientific knowledge. Politics depends on civic or individual level study. While religion has depended on doctrinal beliefs which is faith based and it relies on faith. There is acknowledgement given to reason, evidence and empiricism in science. However revealation, sacredness and faith is given importance in religion along with the need to explain philosophy and metaphysical elements.

Science and religion are not considered having a deep connection as they have separate ways of involvement. There is an establishment of an argument or concelusion with religious importance through the power of science. Technology can be a bridge to create ways for fruitful interaction between science and religion.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse I
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.