Is Craig Lindley’s behavior a sign of some psychological problem that Rayburn Un

Question

Is Craig Lindley’s behavior a sign of some psychological problem that Rayburn Unlimited should help him overcome, perhaps with counseling? Or is dismissal called for? Should Al Smetana fire Craig to send a message to other employees not to misuse company time and resources? (At least 500 word reply)

Please use the below case to answer this question:

“Web Porn at Work”

AL Smetana Is The Founding President Of a medium-size, Midwestern manufacturing firm, Rayburn Unlimited. He’s proud of the way his company has grown, and done so on the basis of an organizational culture committed to honesty, integrity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. But now those values are being put to the test.

It began when Al learned that an employee had tapped into the company’s computer system and figured out how to read people’s e-mail and to learn what websites they visited. Determining who the culprit was wasn’t difficult. When con- fronted about it, the employee admitted what he had done. Al immediately terminated his employment. But as he left, the employee said angrily, “Just ask Lindley about his computer usage,” referring to Craig Lindley, associate vice president for human resources and an old friend of Al’s. Although Al didn’t trust the discharged employee, he was disturbed by his com- ment and reluctant to let it go. So he called Craig Lindley into his office and asked him about it.

After a few minutes of gentle questioning, Craig started weeping. When he recovered himself, he explained that for the past year or so he had been hooked on pornography on the web and at the office sometimes spent an hour or so a day looking at it. Al asked him whether his wife knew. Craig said she didn’t. He was too ashamed of his habit to talk to her or anybody else about it. Al then told him to take the rest of the day off, to think the matter over, and to return to Al’s office the next morning. When Craig left, Al stood and looked out the window, silently asking himself what he should do.

Explanation / Answer

Although Craig Lindley’s position is to set an example for his team and every other employee below the hierarchy, his actions come under misusing of company time and resources, whereas it is the loophole of the organization that the such websites are so easily accessible through the organization. So the first order of business of Al Smetana is to contact the IT department to block such websites for good to lower down any more harm or reputation of the company.

The employee’s termination status should be kept maintained because he was violating the direct code of conduct of accessing unauthorized individual as well as organizational information. We also know that Craig Lindley is not a sexual assaulter or harassed sexually any women in the office instead he readily admitted of his doing over a period of time so he should be counselled for it from a psychologist to overcome his behavior, at the same time he should also be presented with a warning letter as a reminder to not indulge into any such activities in further to avoid permanent termination.

There are few points to consider in the following situation though:

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse I
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.