identify the fallacy,if there is one,in each of the following argumentsand prove
ID: 668020 • Letter: I
Question
identify the fallacy,if there is one,in each of the following argumentsand prove your identificationis correct.How would you respond to the fallacy.
1)we've undertaken a number of careful tests on this "food supplement"and found that it contributes nothing to producing healthier skin,greater enerfy,interest in sex,or an improved attitude.We conclude that the item will not sell well and will certainly be a commercial disaster.
2)it is impossible to think without having abstract general ideas,because to think we have to have words,and words can only be had in creatures that have abstract general ideas.
3)of course the petroleum industry would say that burning fossil fuels does not course global warming.They make their livelihood from selling oil.
Explanation / Answer
1)
Provided information of “food supplement” is contains conclusion with adequate proof. This is “Ecological” fallacy.
3)
Provided information of “petroleum industry” is doing appropriate usages for humans. This type of fallacy is called “Bandwagon”
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.