Please respond to the ANSWER in regards to the QUESTION that has been answered.
ID: 668640 • Letter: P
Question
Please respond to the ANSWER in regards to the QUESTION that has been answered.
ANSWER(respond to this):
Thus far, with my limited experience with Linux as an OS, it would seem to me that one of the biggest benefits that a pure-file architecture could provide is that working with solely files makes it so that changes to the file system are much more easily tracked than they would be on a proprietary OS such as Windows, which makes use of a different architecture. Changing any one small file on Linux can effect large-scale change, while doing the same on a relatively locked OS would either do nothing, or end up breaking something on the opposite side of the system, in a seemingly unrelated area.
Downsides, however, come back to what seems to be one of the largest downfalls of a strictly Linux-based system in a consumer market: the organization and manipulation of these files would be much more dependent on someone with a higher threshold of knowledge than the everyday user, seeing as the system appears to be a lot less automated than the offerings that are generally given to the open market. Added to that, if you are again working with a file system that incorporates a single, continuous file tree across multiple disks or partitions even, if even one important file displays any kind of corruption, the implications would be severe and far-reaching, as opposed to a system that uses integrated programs and a master file heirarchy.
Question:
Unix provides a powerfully unified file system. Everything is a file: data, programs, and all physical devices. the entire file system appears as a single large tree of nested directories, regardless of how many different physical devices (disks) are included. What might be a positive, or negative, with this type of file system design?
Explanation / Answer
Pros- multi-user
multi-tasking, priorities, job control
good scalability, built-in TCP/IP stack
built-in standard shell with open functionality
"client-server" concept came from Unices
Cons:no program development kits
no realtime functionality in major releases
incompatibilities in source code because of different
leading standards (SVID/BSD/IBM).
incompatibilities in source code because of different
leading standards (SVID/BSD/IBM).
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.