Roman and Palumbi (2003; Example 12.2) used the amount of genetic variation at m
ID: 90051 • Letter: R
Question
Explanation / Answer
(a) 1. There is an uncertainity in the generation length of whales. What was the average generation time of males and females was not clealy pointed out. The generation time has to interact with the mutation rates to determine actual population size in long term.
2. There was no accurate estimate of mutaion rate in the population. Their mutation rate estimate was low by two fold due to multiple substitutions in the fastly evolving control region of mtDNA, as discovered in future studies.
3. There was only mtDNA based estimate which was unsuccessful to predict long term historical census population size. Instaed the use of Multilocus Nuclear Estimates can give more accurate results, because nuclear DNA has relatively less saturation of substitutions than mtDNA.
(b) Estimates of Roman and Palumbi are solely mtDNA based and depend upon control region mutation only.
The mutation rate estimated by them has proved to be two times slower than the rate of mutations estimated by further studies because fastly evolving mtDNA control region undergoes multiple substitutions in long run.
Although they used a wide range of generation length of whales (about 12 to 24 years), still the generation time of the whales remains unknown.
They found that there was a vast abundance of whales ( in about 150-250 thousands numbers range) prior to whaling. And the inaccuracy in long term abundance estimates was due to uncertain catching records.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.