Engineering Economy Rupees Help Please answer the following questions using the
ID: 1090975 • Letter: E
Question
Engineering Economy Rupees Help
Please answer the following questions using the guidelines provided.
DELIVERABLE: Answers to Case Study Exercises 1
This case study compares benefit/cost analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis on the same information about highway fighting and its role in accident reduction. Poor highway lighting may be one reason that proportionately more traffic accidents occur at night. Traffic accidents are categorized into six types by severity and value. For example, an accident with a fatality is valued at Nothing to transcribeExplanation / Answer
A)
For alternative W
from the data given in the paragraph it is clear that
the ratio of night to day accident involving property damage for the unlighted freeway section is
199/379= 0.525
and for lighted section is 839/2069 = 0.406
so if there would have been no light in the lighted section then no of accidents would have been 2069*0.525= 1086
but there are actuaally 839 accidents so
Effective measure of number of accidents= 1086-839= 247
now
benefit from saving one accident is 6000
so benefit from saving 247 accident is
247*6000
= 1,482,000
Now
two types of costs are invlved in the process of lighting
i) installation cost and ii). annual power cost
to calculate installation cost you need to know rate of installing per pole and total no of poles installed
since total distance is 87.8 Km and each pole is at distance of 67 m
so total number of pole is 87.8*1000/67
= 1310
and installing each pole cost 3500
so total installation cost
=3500*1310
= 4,585,000
now Annual power cost calaculation
we have to calculate total unit consumed by all the bulbs in all the poles
so total no of bulbs= no of poles* no of bulbes per pole
= 1310*2= 2620 bulbs
power of each bulb is 400W= 0.4KW
so enrgy consumed power*time
here time is no of hours in 1 year
= 2620*0.4 *12*365 kW yearly
so rate = enrgy consumed* rate per unit
= 0.1*2620*0.4*12*365
=459024
Now it is to be kept in mind that this datas are for five year but installation cost is only at the beggining of the year
so
annualised cost C at 6% interest rate is given by
so EAC(Effective annual cosT)
we have to apply the method for this
Calculate v:
v = 0.9434
Calculate Discount Factor for installation cost
a5|0.06 = 4.2121
In Microsoft Excel, this function can be written in a cell as =PV(0.06,5,-1)
Calculate Discounted Investment for installation cost
Discounted Investment for Item 1 = $1,088,530.66
Calculate EAC for installation cost
EAC1 = Discounted Investment + Maintenance Cost
EAC1 = $1,088,479
EAC1 = $1,088,479
thus total annual cost
= $1,088,479+459024
= 1,547,503
so B/C= 1,482,000/1,547,503 =0.96
Since B/C<1 the lightning is not justified as cost is greater than the benefit
For ALTERNATIVE X
since benefit decrease by 40%
original benefit was 1482,000
so now benefit= 0.6*1,482,000
=889,200
Now
two types of costs are invlved in the process of lighting
i) installation cost and ii). annual power cost
to calculate installation cost you need to know rate of installing per pole and total no of poles installed
since total distance is 87.8 Km and each pole is at distance of 134 m
so total number of pole is 87.8*1000/134
= 655
and installing each pole cost 3500
so total installation cost
=3500*655
= 2,292,500
now Annual power cost calaculation
we have to calculate total unit consumed by all the bulbs in all the poles
so total no of bulbs= no of poles* no of bulbes per pole
= 655*2= 1310 bulbs
power of each bulb is 400W= 0.4KW
so enrgy consumed power*time
here time is no of hours in 1 year
= 1310*0.4 *12*365 kW yearly
so rate = energy consumed* rate per unit
= 0.1*13100*0.4*12*365
=229,512
Now it is to be kept in mind that this datas are for five year but installation cost is only at the beggining of the year
so
annualised cost C at 6% interest rate is given by
so EAC(Effective annual cosT)
we have to apply the method for this
Calculate v:
consider item 1 as lighning
so B/C= 889,200/773,777 =1.149
Since B/C>1 the lightning is economically justified as cost is less than the benefit.
For ALTERNATIVE Y
since benefit decrease by 25%
original benefit was 1482,000
so now benefit= 0.75*1,482,000
= 1,111,500
Now
two types of costs are invlved in the process of lighting
i) installation cost and ii). annual power cost
to calculate installation cost you need to know rate of installing per pole and total no of poles installed
since total distance is 87.8 Km and each pole is at distance of 67 m
so total number of pole is 87.8*1000/67
= 1310
and installing each pole cost 2500
so total installation cost
=2500*1310
= 3,275,000
now Annual power cost calaculation
we have to calculate total unit consumed by all the bulbs in all the poles
so total no of bulbs= no of poles* no of bulbes per pole
= 1310*2= 2620 bulbs
power of each bulb is 350W= 0.35KW
so enrgy consumed power*time
here time is no of hours in 1 year
= 2620*0.35 *12*365 kW yearly
so rate = energy consumed* rate per unit
= 0.1*2620*0.35 *12*365
=401,646 peryear
Now it is to be kept in mind that this datas are for five year but installation cost is only at the beggining of the year
so
annualised cost C at 6% interest rate is given by
so EAC(Effective annual cosT)
we have to apply the method for this
Calculate v:
v = 0.9434
Calculate Discount Factor for Item 1:
a5|0.06 = 4.2121
In Microsoft Excel, this function can be written in a cell as =PV(0.06,5,-1)
Calculate Discounted Investment for Item 1:
Discounted Investment for Item 1 = $777,521.90
Calculate EAC for Item 1
EAC1 = Discounted Investment + Maintenance Cost
EAC1 = $777,521.90 + $401.00
EAC1 = $777,923
thus B/C for this is
1,11,500/777,523 = 1.429
so it is economically feasible
as cost is less than the benfit...
Alternative Z
Since accident prevention measure become 124 so total benefit
124*6000
= 744,000
two types of costs are invlved in the process of lighting
i) installation cost and ii). annual power cost
to calculate installation cost you need to know rate of installing per pole and total no of poles installed
since total distance is 87.8 Km and each pole is at distance of 134 m
so total number of pole is 87.8*1000/134
= 655
and installing each pole cost 2500
so total installation cost
=2500*655
= 1,637,500
now Annual power cost calaculation
we have to calculate total unit consumed by all the bulbs in all the poles
so total no of bulbs= no of poles* no of bulbes per pole
= 655*2= 1310 bulbs
power of each bulb is 350W= 0.35KW
so enrgy consumed power*time
here time is no of hours in 1 year
= 1310*0.35 *12*365 kW yearly
so rate = energy consumed* rate per unit
= 0.1*13100*0.35*12*365
=200,823
Now it is to be kept in mind that this datas are for five year but installation cost is only at the beggining of the year
so
annualised cost C at 6% interest rate is given by
so EAC(Effective annual cosT)
we have to apply the method for this
Calculate v:
v = 0.9434
Calculate Discount Factor for Item 1:
a5|0.06 = 4.2121
In Microsoft Excel, this function can be written in a cell as =PV(0.06,5,-1)
Calculate Discounted Investment for Item 1:
Discounted Investment for Item 1 = $388,760.95
Calculate EAC for Item 1
EAC1 = Discounted Investment + Maintenance Cost
EAC1 = $388,760.95 + $200,823.00
EAC1 = $589,584
so
B/C ratio is 744000/589584 = 1.2619
thus B/C>1
so economically it is justified
Q.2
we have
we have taken cost from part A as we have calculated for each part...
E for W is given
for X it is 60% of this =0.6*247=148
for Y it is 75% of this = 0.75*247 =185
for X it is 124 given
so Y has minimum C/E ratio... thus it is best of these alternatives
also all those alternatives whose C/E ratio is less than the base given in question that one is better as compared to W
Q.3).
from the data given in the paragraph it is clear that
the ratio of night to day accident involving property damage for the unlighted freeway section is
199/379= 0.525
and for lighted section is 839/2069 = 0.406
so if there would have been light in the nolight section then no of accidents would have been 379*0.406= 154
but there are actuaally 199 accidents so
Effective measure of number of accidents= 199-154= 45
so prevented damage
= 45*6000
= 270,000
Q.5.
Benefit/Cost (B/C) Analysis is defined as a systematic process for calculating and comparing benefits and costs of a project for two purposes:
Benefit/Cost analysis is also commonly referred to as Cost-Benefit Analysis, CBA, Benefit/Cost Analysis, and BCA. The analysis is identical despite the naming differences. Benefit/costs analysis is one type of economic valuation
v = 1 1 + Cost of CapitalRelated Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.